2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.013630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating entanglement using integrals of motion

Abstract: A quantum Galilean cannon is a 1D sequence of N hard-core particles with special mass ratios, and a hard wall; conservation laws due to the reflection group AN prevent both classical stochastization and quantum diffraction. It is realizable through specie-alternating mutually repulsive bosonic soliton trains. We show that an initial disentangled state can evolve into one where the heavy and light particles are entangled, and propose a sensor, containing N total atoms, with a √ N total times higher sensitivity … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we show that for hard-core interactions there exist families of unequal masses for which there are exact solutions for the ground state and all excited states. This extends results first derived for hardcore interactions in free space [33][34][35]. Exact solutions for hard-core interactions form the basis for approximation schemes for strongly-interacting systems, providing a valuable benchmark for testing numerical methods [36][37][38].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article, we show that for hard-core interactions there exist families of unequal masses for which there are exact solutions for the ground state and all excited states. This extends results first derived for hardcore interactions in free space [33][34][35]. Exact solutions for hard-core interactions form the basis for approximation schemes for strongly-interacting systems, providing a valuable benchmark for testing numerical methods [36][37][38].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the third scheme, described in more detail in [35], the role of massive particles is played by bosonic solitons in an atom waveguides [78][79][80]. The solitons are made of atoms in two alternating internal states where the intraspecies interaction is attractive and the interspecies interaction is repulsive.…”
Section: Experimental Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another motivation for considering the quantum version of this system is the daunting experimental challenge of realizing Galperin billiards with macroscopic objects. Quantum realizations of effectively one-dimensional mixed-mass systems like Galperin billiards can be experimentally realized with ultracold atoms in few-body systems [37] or as bi-solitons in ultracold atomic gases, via a scheme described in [31]. There, a bi-soliton of a desired mass ratio is created using a coupling constant quench [38]; one of the two solitons is subsequently transferred to a different internal atomic state that leads to a repulsion between the solitons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark that the case v in = V in , where v out vanishes, may be regarded as a generalization of a notion of a Galilean Cannon [31]: a system of balls that arrives at the wall with the same speed and transfers all the energy to the far-most one in the end.…”
Section: Superintegrability and Maximal Superintegrabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the Busch et al solution for two particles can be extended to cases of anisotropic harmonic traps [48]. Third, in the case of a four-body problem and contact forces, neat analytical solutions associated with the symmetries of the three-dimensional and four-dimensional icosahedra were discussed in [49] while a very specific system of N hard-sphere particles having special mass ratios was solved in [50]. Finally, different exact solutions of the two-body problem with other than contact interactions were also announced: an attractive 1/r 6 interaction in [51], a repulsive 1/r 3 interaction in [52,53], and a finite-range (repulsive and attractive) interaction modeled by a step function in [54][55][56].…”
Section: Two Particles In a Harmonic Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%