2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.pb.6000080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating meaning on main street: Towards a model of place branding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to be successful it is widely acknowledged that cobranding should involve some alignment of brand core values, identities, communications and articulation, as the basis for transfer of positive image between the partners in the co-branding relationship (Motion, Leitch & Brodie, 2003). For place branding such alignment would normally centre around the place identity, with all partners benefiting from a stronger and more coherent identity and its articulation (Cai, 2002;Hankinson, 2007;Pryor & Grossbart, 2007;Hanna & Rowley, 2013). It is unrealistic to expect that all partners will commit to the same level of partnership; their commitment will depend on their resources and the actual or potential value of the co-branding relationship to their organisation (Kahuni & Rowley, 2013).…”
Section: Proposing Exemplifying and Discussing The Place Brand Web (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to be successful it is widely acknowledged that cobranding should involve some alignment of brand core values, identities, communications and articulation, as the basis for transfer of positive image between the partners in the co-branding relationship (Motion, Leitch & Brodie, 2003). For place branding such alignment would normally centre around the place identity, with all partners benefiting from a stronger and more coherent identity and its articulation (Cai, 2002;Hankinson, 2007;Pryor & Grossbart, 2007;Hanna & Rowley, 2013). It is unrealistic to expect that all partners will commit to the same level of partnership; their commitment will depend on their resources and the actual or potential value of the co-branding relationship to their organisation (Kahuni & Rowley, 2013).…”
Section: Proposing Exemplifying and Discussing The Place Brand Web (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of brand identity is affected by the attractiveness of the environment offering aesthetic pleasure through architecture (Harmaakorpi, Kari, & Parjanen, 2008) and a spectrum of parameters including culture, history, and the economy. Brand identity is co-produced and reified by multiple stakeholders (Cai, 2002) through the production of marketplace symbols (historic plaques, decorations, sculptures, benches, planters) and the enhancement of rituals (street parties, parades, ceremonies, sales events, artistic performances) (Pryor & Grossbart, 2007), influencing experience and what the place has come to be known for. Accordingly, brand infrastructure relationships have an influence on the development of brand identity, as the latter is dependent on the dynamic of stakeholder relationships.…”
Section: Brand Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frekar stutt er síðan rannsóknir hófust fyrir alvöru á hugtakinu þó hugmyndin um það hafi verið til staðar í nokkrar aldir (sjá til daemis Amine og Chao, 2004;Anholt, 2002;Pryor og Grossbart, 2007). Kenningar og skilgreiningar um vörumerki staða hafa mótast af umfjöllun margra ólíkra aðila, til daemis félagsfraeðinga, landfraeðinga, stjórnmálafraeðinga, hagfraeðinga og viðskiptafraeðinga (Pryor og Grossbart, 2007). Vörumerki staða byggja einnig á kenningum og þekkingu úr opinberri stefnumótun, alþjóðlegri markaðssetningu, auglýsingum, neytendahegðun og öðrum tengdum greinum (Amine og Chao, 2004).…”
Section: áFangastaðir Og þJóðríki Sem Vörumerkiunclassified