2008
DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecn017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Specialised Dictionaries for Foreign Language Learners: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Nesi and Meara (1994) indicate that the information provided by monolingual dictionaries are partially understood by some and misunderstood by other learners. Furthermore, Kaalep and Mikk (2008) argue that the major problem of monolingual dictionaries is that the language in which the definitions are given are hard to understand by L2 language learners. Additionally, Chen (2011) asserts that bilingual entries are ideal for quick understanding.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Nesi and Meara (1994) indicate that the information provided by monolingual dictionaries are partially understood by some and misunderstood by other learners. Furthermore, Kaalep and Mikk (2008) argue that the major problem of monolingual dictionaries is that the language in which the definitions are given are hard to understand by L2 language learners. Additionally, Chen (2011) asserts that bilingual entries are ideal for quick understanding.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revisamos a continuación las características o requisitos de ese diccionario para estudiantes de ESP partiendo para ello de algunos de los principios aceptados en este campo del saber, que pueden estudiarse con más detalle en la literatura especializada, por ejemplo en Bogaards (1996), Fuertes-Olivera (2010a y 2012) Fuertes-Olivera y Arribas-Baño (2008), Kaalep y Mikk (2008), Pujol, Corrius y Masnou (2006), Rundell (1999), Scholfield (1999) Tarp (2004Tarp ( ) y (2008, y Verlinde y Binon (2009). Por motivos de espacio vamos a referirnos a tres requisitos básicos y generales que afectan a todos los tipos de diccionarios pedagógicos.…”
Section: El Diccionario Como Herramienta Pedagógicaunclassified
“…Search possibilities in paper dictionaries are limited: the search is restricted to the arrangement of contents by the lexicographer, which is always alphabetical (Sallas 2001) and, therefore, is limited to the search for an exact word (Santana et al 1996: 70). In contrast, searches in electronic dictionaries are quicker and more flexible because they incorporate more advanced search techniques (Sánchez 2004b: 181, Kaalep and Mikk 2008).…”
Section: Electronic Dictionaries and Search Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%