2015
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creation of a simple distal femur morphology classification system

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to propose a binary classification system based on simple measurements that summarizes individual, race, and sex-specific differences in distal femur shape. Surface models of 165 distal femurs (79 female, 86 male; 85 African-American, 80 Caucasian, 28.8 AE 7.6 years) were created with a 3-dimensional laser scanner. Surface area, width, length, curvature, and angulation were measured. Knees were classified as either type A or B within five distinct categories: (i) aspect ratio, (ii)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
3
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lonner and Gillespie et al indicated that the overall variability of the anatomy of the distal femur should be taken into account but not sex differences [ 16 , 17 ]. According to the individual differences, Everhart et al proposed a binary classification system to describe the shape of the distal femur and five binary categories were selected based on the aspect ratio, trochlear width, trochlear tilt, the ratio of medial and lateral trochlear width, and trochlear groove angle [ 47 ]. In addition, Varadarajan et al reported that the laterally oriented proximal part and medially oriented distal part formed the intact trochlear groove, and there was a turning point to distinguish these two parts [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lonner and Gillespie et al indicated that the overall variability of the anatomy of the distal femur should be taken into account but not sex differences [ 16 , 17 ]. According to the individual differences, Everhart et al proposed a binary classification system to describe the shape of the distal femur and five binary categories were selected based on the aspect ratio, trochlear width, trochlear tilt, the ratio of medial and lateral trochlear width, and trochlear groove angle [ 47 ]. In addition, Varadarajan et al reported that the laterally oriented proximal part and medially oriented distal part formed the intact trochlear groove, and there was a turning point to distinguish these two parts [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, since all the data was from a single-centered database, only patients in a regional area were included in this study. Different regions, ethnicity, and social development might be potential influence factors (27) and should be taken into consideration in future studies. Nonetheless, this is the first study that systematically described the fracture characteristics of a large number of distal femur fractures (n=217).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lonner and Gillespie et al indicated that the overall variability of the anatomy of the distal femur should be taken into account but not gender difference [19,32]. According to the individual differences, Everhart et al proposed a binary classi cation system to describe the shape of the distal femur and ve binary categories were selected based on the aspect ratio, trochlear width, trochlear tilt, the ratio of medial and lateral trochlear width, and trochlear groove angle [14]. Besides, Varadarajan et al reported that the laterally oriented proximal part and medially oriented distal part formed the intact trochlear groove, and there was a turning point to distinguish these two part [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%