2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creativity of Field-dependent and Field-independent Students in Posing Mathematical Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
5
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of the limitations associated with organizing RFTs, there might be the need for teachers and facilitators to support RFTs with innovative virtual activities, in line with the pedagogical objectives of the RFT centering around encouraging students' critical and reflective thinking. This finding supports the work of Azlina, Amin and Lukito, et al [38], where field-independent students demonstrated higher levels of creativity than their field-dependent counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, because of the limitations associated with organizing RFTs, there might be the need for teachers and facilitators to support RFTs with innovative virtual activities, in line with the pedagogical objectives of the RFT centering around encouraging students' critical and reflective thinking. This finding supports the work of Azlina, Amin and Lukito, et al [38], where field-independent students demonstrated higher levels of creativity than their field-dependent counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Students with field-dependent cognitive styles find it challenging to concentrate on one aspect of a situation or examine trends in various sections (Firdausy, Setyaningsih & Waluyo, 2019). The results are in accordance with Azlina, Amin, & Lukito (2018), that individuals who have an FD cognitive style do not reflect their weaknesses in mathematics problemsolving probably.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Then, the video created by the students also showed that flexibity and fluency as two highest indicators achieved by the students in project accompolishment. It was similar with the research by Azlina, Amin, and Lukito (2018) who stated that flexibilty, novelty and fluency were the elements of students' creativity. It can also be interpreted that students who have better interpersonal communication skill would think more creatively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, Gralewski and Karwowski (2018) argued that there are two students' creative styles; adaptors and innovators. Azlina, Amin and Lukito (2018) stated that there are three components of creativity on mathematical-problem solving; flexibilty, novelty and fluency. Then, students' creativity as a result, the creativty of EFL students will have more opportunities to produce creative idea, to speak a specific topic, and to build up the confidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%