Crecimiento económico en América Latina: Algunos determinantes desde la perspectiva austriaca

Abstract

Latin America and especially Ecuador are considered territories with great prospects for economic growth. However, economic growth since they became republics is far from satisfactory. For this reason, classical, neoclassical, Keynesian political economy, Latin American thinkers and even neo-institutionalism have proposed a whole series of causes of economic growth. However, most of the proposals either tend more towards the search for macroeconomic balance by departing from the context or, on the contrary. The objective of this work is to combine institutional and economic aspects from the theory of capital seen as an intertemporal process. A bibliographical research was carried out showing the Austrian institutional vision and its contribution to the macroeconomics of the intertemporal structure of capital. The most important result is that political instability in Latin America chronically affects growth and its quality. It is concluded that political processes in Latin America have chronically affected the timeless structure of capital where the production of superior goods has given preference to first-order goods, thereby affecting both long-term growth and economic diversification.

Incidencia del deporte en el crecimiento económico en Colombia (Incidence of sport on economic growth in Colombia)

“…En este sentido, las actividades productivas tienen un impacto social, cultural y económico en los territorios (Manjarres et al, 2022). Diversas corrientes de pensamiento, como la economía política clásica, neoclásica, keynesiana y el neoinstitucionalismo, han propuesto una serie de causas para el crecimiento económico (Labarca & Panchana, 2022). Además, el crecimiento económico se ve influenciado por los sectores industriales que se desarrollan en los países, con implicaciones tanto económicas como sociales (Yagual et al, 2019).…”