1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02647082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep and ductility in an Al-Cu solid-solution alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. The transition from VGC to DCC as shown in various solid solution alloys 9,10,[30][31][32][33][34] The expanded normalized stress-strain rate plot containing data for pure magnesium 10) and Mg-0.8%Al alloy.…”
Section: Transition Of Deformation Mechanism In Mg Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. The transition from VGC to DCC as shown in various solid solution alloys 9,10,[30][31][32][33][34] The expanded normalized stress-strain rate plot containing data for pure magnesium 10) and Mg-0.8%Al alloy.…”
Section: Transition Of Deformation Mechanism In Mg Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have suggested that the flow stress during climb-controlled dislocation creep in solid solution alloys such as Al-based alloys, [28][29][30] Cu-based alloys 31) and Mg-based alloys 32,33) is dependent on the stacking fault energy. The decrease in stacking fault energy due to the alloying in solid solution alloys usually improves the creep resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in stacking fault energy due to the alloying in solid solution alloys usually improves the creep resistance. [28][29][30][31][32][33] It is explained that the root of solid solution strengthening in Sn-Zn alloys is also the decrease in the stacking fault energy due to the addition of Zn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pure metals, such as aluminum, and solid-solution alloys of class II (metal class), such as aluminum-5% zinc [232), n -5 whereas for solid-solution alloys of class I (alloy class), such as aluminum-copper alloys [233] and aluminum-magnesium alloys [234,235], n can be 3 or 5 depending on experimental conditions and materials parameters [236,237]. The creep behavior of metals and alloys of class II is generally attributed to some form of dislocation climb process [230,231,[236][237][238] whereas that of alloys of class I is generally attributed to the presence of a viscous drag process operating on the dislocations during glide [230,231,236,237,239].…”
Section: Deformation Models Based On Dislocation Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth mentioning that creep activation energies measured in some Al solid-solution alloystt [233,252,253] at high stresses, where n=5, are higher than that for self diffusion and range from 160-210 U/mole: for example, Qc reported for Al-3% Cu [233] under the above conditions (-r > 5 MPa and n=5) is 205 U/mole. 12 524 234 14 438 249 16 397 255 18 340 225 20 338 241 22 322 237 24 308 232 26 291 222 28 275 212 30 263 201 32 246 191 Avg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%