2021
DOI: 10.1142/s021945542150139x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep Effect on the Dynamic Response of Train-Track-Continuous Bridge System

Abstract: The influence of track irregularity and deck deformation on the running safety of high-speed railway (HSR) trains is investigated, with emphasis placed on those caused by the creep of continuous prestressed bridges. A bridge model is established with CRTS II ballastless track to account for a train-track-bridge (TTB) system. The creep effect is calculated by the finite element software MIDAS/Civil. The accuracy of the numerical simulation is confirmed by comparing the numerical predictions with field measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, a subgrade section with a length of 400 m is manually added to the model for eliminating the boundary effect of the rails in the subgrade section. The accuracy of this TTBS model was verified by comparing the field measured data with the model calculation results (Xiang et al 2021).…”
Section: Wheel-rail Contactmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Besides, a subgrade section with a length of 400 m is manually added to the model for eliminating the boundary effect of the rails in the subgrade section. The accuracy of this TTBS model was verified by comparing the field measured data with the model calculation results (Xiang et al 2021).…”
Section: Wheel-rail Contactmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The parameters and layout of the bridge structure have been explained in Ref. [26]. The train adopts the CRH2 model of the Chinese high-speed multiple unit train, consisting of 2 multiple units and 6 trailers, with a total of 8 car bodies.…”
Section: Validation Of Kle-pem Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bridge models selected for the deterministic and uncertainty analysis of vehicle dynamic response are both continuous beam bridges and simply supported beam bridges, with a total of 7 spans and a length of 304 m. The train adopts the CRH2 model of China High Speed Multiple Unit, as shown in Figure 2, and the bridge and train parameters are in Ref. [26]. The main difference between deterministic analysis and uncertainty analysis of train dynamic response lies in the initial unevenness of the track.…”
Section: Comparison Of Train Certainty Analysis and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gong [9] studied the in uence of spatially varying ground motion on the dynamic behavior of a train passing through a cablestayed bridge. Xiang [10] investigated the in uence of the track irregularity and deck deformation on the running safety of HSR trains. Chen [11] studied the in uence of track sti ness on dynamic behaviors of the high-speed vehicletrack-bridge dynamic system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the secondary dead load is applied to the girder body by increasing the bulk density of materials. Because the concrete bridge will arch due to the creep, which will in uence the running stability of the vehicle [10,18], the creep is taken as the initial deformation of the bridge deck in the model. e uniform sti ness matrix and the uniform mass matrix are adopted in dynamic analysis with Rayleigh damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%