2001
DOI: 10.1115/1.1430669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creeping Flow Through an Axisymmetric Sudden Contraction or Expansion

Abstract: Creeping flow through a sudden contraction/expansion in an axisymmetric pipe is studied. Sampson’s solution for flow through a circular orifice in an infinite wall is used to derive an approximation for the excess pressure drop due to a sudden contraction/expansion in a pipe with a finite expansion ratio. The accuracy of this approximation obtained is verified by comparing its results to finite-element simulations and other previous numerical studies. The result can also be extended to a thin annular obstacle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Newtonian case, this approach is valuable because of the complex geometries encountered in the network (Thompson and Fogler, 1997). However, simpler approaches can also be used, which make use of known functionalities between frictional loss and duct geometries (for example, Sisavath et al, 2001Sisavath et al, , 2002. In this article, due to the non-Newtonian behavior, detailed simulations have been used, because it is not clear how to properly choose the equivalent throat geometries so as to quantify the flow behavior.…”
Section: Appendix a Streamline-scale Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the Newtonian case, this approach is valuable because of the complex geometries encountered in the network (Thompson and Fogler, 1997). However, simpler approaches can also be used, which make use of known functionalities between frictional loss and duct geometries (for example, Sisavath et al, 2001Sisavath et al, , 2002. In this article, due to the non-Newtonian behavior, detailed simulations have been used, because it is not clear how to properly choose the equivalent throat geometries so as to quantify the flow behavior.…”
Section: Appendix a Streamline-scale Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18 arises from taking into account the additional resistance to fluid flow due to the presence of the sudden contraction/expansion (Sisavath et al 2002). The main differences between Eqs.…”
Section: Prediction Of Permeability and Electrical Formation Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)), the normalized pressure (p/(ÁU B /d)) variation becomes independent of ER and is essentially that given for an exit flow at the same Deborah number, except for the very small contribution from the entry region. For De = 0 this corresponds approximately to half the entry pressure drop for creeping flow through a rectangular orifice plate (a sudden contraction followed by a sudden expansion), a Sampson-like solution for the circular duct [27].…”
Section: High Expansion Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%