2022
DOI: 10.3390/insects13020129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cricket Meal (Gryllus bimaculatus) as a Protein Supplement on In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Mitigation

Abstract: The aim of this work was to conduct the effects of cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) meal (CM) as a protein supplement on in vitro gas production, rumen fermentation, and methane (CH4) mitigation. Dietary treatments were randomly assigned using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement. The first factor was two ratios of roughage to concentrate (R:C at 60:40 and 40:60), and the second factor was the level of CM to replace soybean meal (SBM) in a concentrate ratio at 100:0, 75:25, 50:5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When using four edible insects, namely the house cricket (Acheta domesticus L.), the Taiwan giant cricket (Brachytrupes portentosus Serville), the two-spotted cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer) and the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.), as substitutes for the 25% of SBM in a 60:40 F:C diet, Ahmed et al (2021) found no adverse effects on rumen fermentation characteristics or nutrient digestibility. This clearly suggests, as expected and recently confirmed by Phesatcha et al (2022), that the insect dietary inclusion level also significantly affects fermentation and digestibility, as already reported to occur for monogastric animals (Elahi et al, 2022;Hong and Kim, 2022;Tran et al, 2022). Furthermore, Phesatcha et al (2022) demonstrated that, when using G. bimaculatus meal as a protein replacement for SBM, regardless of the insect dietary inclusion or substitution level, fermentation and digestibility parameters were also affected by the F:C ratio of the diet, thus highlighting the great complexity of factors and interactions involved.…”
Section: Digestibility and Methanogenesissupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When using four edible insects, namely the house cricket (Acheta domesticus L.), the Taiwan giant cricket (Brachytrupes portentosus Serville), the two-spotted cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer) and the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.), as substitutes for the 25% of SBM in a 60:40 F:C diet, Ahmed et al (2021) found no adverse effects on rumen fermentation characteristics or nutrient digestibility. This clearly suggests, as expected and recently confirmed by Phesatcha et al (2022), that the insect dietary inclusion level also significantly affects fermentation and digestibility, as already reported to occur for monogastric animals (Elahi et al, 2022;Hong and Kim, 2022;Tran et al, 2022). Furthermore, Phesatcha et al (2022) demonstrated that, when using G. bimaculatus meal as a protein replacement for SBM, regardless of the insect dietary inclusion or substitution level, fermentation and digestibility parameters were also affected by the F:C ratio of the diet, thus highlighting the great complexity of factors and interactions involved.…”
Section: Digestibility and Methanogenesissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This clearly suggests, as expected and recently confirmed by Phesatcha et al (2022), that the insect dietary inclusion level also significantly affects fermentation and digestibility, as already reported to occur for monogastric animals (Elahi et al, 2022;Hong and Kim, 2022;Tran et al, 2022). Furthermore, Phesatcha et al (2022) demonstrated that, when using G. bimaculatus meal as a protein replacement for SBM, regardless of the insect dietary inclusion or substitution level, fermentation and digestibility parameters were also affected by the F:C ratio of the diet, thus highlighting the great complexity of factors and interactions involved.…”
Section: Digestibility and Methanogenesissupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chitin, present in insects, is considered a hard-to-degrade fiber that can reduce nutrient digestibility and absorption [44]. Therefore, removing chitin content from insect products has been suggested as a way to improve nutrient availability and digestibility [45]. However, a study with Jamaican cricket beetles found no difference in in vitro OM digestibility when the chitin content was manually or chemically removed [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the highest protein content is in cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, with 61% -69% protein (this species was used in this study) (Jeong et al, 2021;Phesatcha et al, 2022;Udomsil et al, 2019). The carbohydrate-protein ratio from that report is also compared directly from the references (Figure 4).…”
Section: Diet Content and Financial Costmentioning
confidence: 97%