The Eurogang Paradox 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0882-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crips in Orange: Gangs and Groups in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, culture has been the chief explanation given to explain how we find Crips in The Netherlands (Van Gemert 2001) and the A and B gangs in Oslo (Lien 2001). Both Van Gemert and Lien depend on cultural explanations to account for the presence of gangs with American roots in these northern European nations.…”
Section: Culture Migration and Marginalizationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In any case, culture has been the chief explanation given to explain how we find Crips in The Netherlands (Van Gemert 2001) and the A and B gangs in Oslo (Lien 2001). Both Van Gemert and Lien depend on cultural explanations to account for the presence of gangs with American roots in these northern European nations.…”
Section: Culture Migration and Marginalizationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It has become apparent that the study of gangs can no longer be limited to local conditions, but must also considered in the global context. For there are now Jamaican ‘posses’ in Kansas (Gunst 1995), Mexican gangs in San Diego (Rotella 1998), Russian ‘maffia’ in Chicago (Finckenauer and Waring 1998), female Muslim gangs in Oslo (Lien 2002), LA's MS‐13 and 18th Street gangs in Honduras and El Salvador (Decesare 2003), Nigerian drug smugglers coming through Ronald Reagan International Airport (Grennan, Britz, Rush and Barker 2000), LA's Crips gang in the Netherlands (van Gemert 2001), US tongs linked to Chinese Triads (Booth 1999), and numerous other examples of global networking of gangs. Sullivan (2006) divides gangs into three levels: first generation gangs, which are traditional street (or prison) gangs with a turf orientation; second generation gangs, which have a business focus; and third generation gangs, which have evolved political aims.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys involving younger samples, however, call into question the extent to which these stereotypes accurately depict youth gang members. A similar picture of gang members appears to be evolving in Europe, based largely on police accounts and on relatively recent ethnographic studies (Lien 2001;Van Gemert 2001;Tertilt 2001). To what extent, however, are these findings based upon stereotyping or on limited information?…”
Section: Sources Of Information and Gang Member Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%