2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis, charisma, values, and voting behavior in the 2004 presidential election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
4
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional studies support the argument that charismatic leadership can develop outside of crises (Halverson et al, 2004;Pillai & Meindl, 1998). Still others have found a negative relationship between charismatic leadership and crisis situations (Bligh, Kohles, & Pillai, 2005;Pillai & Meindl, 1998;Williams, Pillai, Lowe, Jung, & Herst, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Additional studies support the argument that charismatic leadership can develop outside of crises (Halverson et al, 2004;Pillai & Meindl, 1998). Still others have found a negative relationship between charismatic leadership and crisis situations (Bligh, Kohles, & Pillai, 2005;Pillai & Meindl, 1998;Williams, Pillai, Lowe, Jung, & Herst, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Jung and Avolio (2000) also found that value congruence held by followers mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and follower performance. In contrast, Williams, Pillai, Lowe, Jung, and Herst (2009) recently examined the mediating role of value congruence on voters' perception of charismatic leadership toward U.S. presidential candidates and their voting behavior and found that, although value congruence was positively related to attributed charisma, it did not moderate or mediate the relationship.…”
Section: Value Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea was supported by Bligh et al's (2004b) research, which found that President Bush's speech contained more references to values, beliefs, and faith-based principles after the events of September 11 th than before. Other research suggests that voting behavior is likely influenced by the value congruence between the presidential candidate and voter (Williams et al, 2004). Thus, we hypothesize that:…”
Section: Charismatic Rhetoric: Collective Identity and Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%