2021
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202100209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis in South American regionalism and Brazilian protagonism in Unasur, the Lima Group and Prosur

Abstract: Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is argued that Chile, Colombia, and Peru have deployed efforts to influence South American regionalism through different initiatives. This analysis focuses solely on Prosur because its emergence is deeply connected to the dismantling of Unasur even as it has sought to replace Unasur's role in South American regional governance (Barros & Gonçalves, 2021).…”
Section: Pragmatism Flexibility and Lean Structure: How The Pacific A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is argued that Chile, Colombia, and Peru have deployed efforts to influence South American regionalism through different initiatives. This analysis focuses solely on Prosur because its emergence is deeply connected to the dismantling of Unasur even as it has sought to replace Unasur's role in South American regional governance (Barros & Gonçalves, 2021).…”
Section: Pragmatism Flexibility and Lean Structure: How The Pacific A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new arrangements are the Lima Group, Forum for the Progress of South America (Prosur), and the Leticia Pact, proposed by Peru, Chile, and Colombia. At the heart of this phenomenon resides the lack of Brazilian leadership in the region, and the efforts of Chile, Colombia, and Peru to establish such agendas instead (Barros & Gonçalves, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PROSUR never came to occupy a relevant role in the Brazilian government. With the pandemic, in 2020, President Piñera convened three virtual meetings for debates on possible cooperation, which did not have the presence of Bolsonaro (Barros et al 2021).…”
Section: Brazil and South America: How Ideas From Bolsonaro's Governm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still no consolidated literature on this topic. Nevertheless, Barros and Gonçalves's (2021) work is one significant exception. On Brazilian foreign policy in general, one may find relevant works such as papers by Casarões (2020;, Caballero and Crescentino (2020), Casarões and Saraiva (2021), Casarões and Farias (2021), Saraiva and Albuquerque (2022), and Pinheiro and Santos (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aspect of governance in South America also appears in the contribution of Pedro Barros and Julia Borba de Souza Gonçalves. Their article "Crisis in South American regionalism and Brazilian protagonism in Unasur, Lima Group and Prosur" assesses the crisis of regional governance in South America, from 2017 onwards, analyzing the emergence of regional initiatives (Lima Group, Prosur, and Pact of Leticia) and their agendas to replace Unasur's role, and how they are the results of global (Brexit, rising nationalism, protest against institutions) and regional (Venezuelan crisis, political polarization, economic disintegration) events (Barros and Gonçalves 2021).…”
Section: Performing Crises and Governance In The 21 St Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%