2008
DOI: 10.3905/jfi.2008.712350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis-Robust Bond Portfolios

Abstract: This paper defines a "crisis-robust portfolio" that satisfies the minimal crisis-toquiet time volatility ratio. This type of portfolio is less demanding for the investor than a regime-wise asset allocation. Although general, the concept of a crisisrobust portfolio is especially pertinent when applied to the bond market, which offers a flight-to-quality trade-off during crises (all volatilities increase but most correlations decrease). Using three categories of bonds (sovereign, investment grade corporate, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Government bonds (both nominal and inflation-linked), corporate investment grade, high yield, emerging, mortgages, etc. show significant diversification potential (Brière and Szafarz, 2008;Brière and Signori, 2009). Pension funds can also exploit time variation in the bond risk premia (Koijen et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government bonds (both nominal and inflation-linked), corporate investment grade, high yield, emerging, mortgages, etc. show significant diversification potential (Brière and Szafarz, 2008;Brière and Signori, 2009). Pension funds can also exploit time variation in the bond risk premia (Koijen et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, one promising avenue for research is the way sector-specific and/or country-specific investments could help robustify global portfolios (Brière and Szafarz, 2008;Brière et al, 2010). For this, adequate sector delineation is a prerequisite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, Briere and Szafarz (2008) found that junk bond returns are inferior to investment-grade bond returns in the long run and evidence that the standard deviation of high-yield bond returns is lower than the standard deviation of investment-grade bond returns in the long-term horizon. Zivney et al (1993) argue that studies dated back to 1990 have failed to recognize the largest two constituents of volatility of fixed-income security returns: the capital gains or losses, resulting from changes in interest rates, and the reinvestment rate of coupons that are received at the current level of return, which may differ substantially from the promised yield to maturity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%