2022
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2087603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria of quality in fiction-based research to promote debate about the use of AI and robots in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again addressing RQ1, the multiple affordances of GenAI-facilitated pedagogical innovation in HE are documented in a number of publications, such as Archibald et al ( 2023), Chang et al (2022), Cox et al (2022), Razia et al (2022), Zhang (2022), andZhou (2022), which detail advantages such as content generation for lectures or assessments, assisted data analysis, and greater administrative efficiency. Ghnemat et al (2022) take a similar approach and make a convincing call for further investigation into AI-based learning.…”
Section: Implications Of Genai For He Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again addressing RQ1, the multiple affordances of GenAI-facilitated pedagogical innovation in HE are documented in a number of publications, such as Archibald et al ( 2023), Chang et al (2022), Cox et al (2022), Razia et al (2022), Zhang (2022), andZhou (2022), which detail advantages such as content generation for lectures or assessments, assisted data analysis, and greater administrative efficiency. Ghnemat et al (2022) take a similar approach and make a convincing call for further investigation into AI-based learning.…”
Section: Implications Of Genai For He Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%