1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01006954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria of reliability for light microscopic immunocytochemical staining

Abstract: The following criteria of reliability are defined and discussed for immunocytochemical staining at the light microscopical level: efficiency, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Whenever practical, tests are suggested for obtaining information on the extent to which these criteria are fulfilled in a given system, and procedures are outlined for improving immunocytochemical staining in terms of these criteria. It is suggested that consideration of reliability criteria will help investigators in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In immunohistochemical terms, specificity should be discussed in sets of two criteria, method specificity and antibody specificity. 27 Method specificity is the absence of any unwanted staining, but antibody specificity is more difficult to evaluate. Regarding the use of immunologic tests for the diagnosis of BISD, cross reactions to other bacteria have been observed for monoclonal 1 and polyclonal 28 antibodies, but such reactions have not been described for MAbs 4D3 and 2G5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 In immunohistochemical terms, specificity should be discussed in sets of two criteria, method specificity and antibody specificity. 27 Method specificity is the absence of any unwanted staining, but antibody specificity is more difficult to evaluate. Regarding the use of immunologic tests for the diagnosis of BISD, cross reactions to other bacteria have been observed for monoclonal 1 and polyclonal 28 antibodies, but such reactions have not been described for MAbs 4D3 and 2G5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Specificity in immunohistochemistry is troublesome, especially because antibody specificity is difficult to determine. 27 Using polyclonal antisera, lot variations occur, and cross-reactivity is commonly associated with such sera, also being observed for polyclonal antisera against R. salmoninarum. 28 Cross-reactivity has also been reported for monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against R. salmoninarum in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques, l although recently MAbs, 4D3 and 2G5, have been reported to identify 2 different surface protein epitopes unique for R. salmoninarum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method specificity (25) was tested by a series of increasing dilutions of the primary antiserum, resulting in a gradual decrease and eventual disappearance of the immunostaining. Antiserum specificity was tested by absorption of the anti-CRF serum with synthetic CRF, bovine insulin (Sigma), glucagon (Sigma), synthetic SR-IF-14 (Beckman Bioproducts, Palo Alto, CA), pentagastrin (Bachem Fine Chemicals, Marina Proc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main parameters which should be fulfilled in a satisfactory manner have been classified by PETRUSZ et al (1980PETRUSZ et al ( , 1983 in the following terms: standardization, reproducibility, precision, accuracy, and efficiency. In accord with these parameters we have tested immunohistochemical methods including immunofluorescence, the labelled and non-labelled antibody enzyme technique, the avidin-biotin-complex (ABC) method, and immunogold procedures (LARSSON, 1981;MEY, 1983;NOORDEN and POLAK, 1983;STERNBERGER, 1986) in semithin sections.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For immunostaining using the PAP method we strongly recommend incubation of the sections with highly diluted antisera (first layers) and an incubation time of 24 hr (see also BIGBEE et al, 1977;GRUBE,1980a;PETRUSZ et al, 1980;STERNBERGER, 1986). In addition to economical advantages, a high dilution of the first antiserum minimizes the pitfalls caused by the non-specific binding mechanisms of antibodies to tissue components (BUFFA et al, 1979;GRUBE, 1980a;GRUBE and WEBER,1980;STERNBERGER, 1986).…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%