2016
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criterion Validity of the activPAL Activity Monitor for Sedentary and Physical Activity Patterns in People Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract: The activPAL activity monitor underestimated step and transition counts and, therefore, is not valid for measuring these outcomes in people with RA. Relative to direct observation, the activPAL activity monitor is valid for measuring time spent in sedentary, standing, and walking behaviors in people with RA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Operational definitions of a step were provided in 6% (n = 5) of the studies. 42,50,54,60,74 For contextual purposes, we have included other relevant or common definitions, including those provided by the CTA, 9 Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 91 and Oxford English Dictionary. 92 These 8-step definitions are reported in Supplementary Material 3 (available online).…”
Section: Catalog Of Study Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operational definitions of a step were provided in 6% (n = 5) of the studies. 42,50,54,60,74 For contextual purposes, we have included other relevant or common definitions, including those provided by the CTA, 9 Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 91 and Oxford English Dictionary. 92 These 8-step definitions are reported in Supplementary Material 3 (available online).…”
Section: Catalog Of Study Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ActivPAL uses accelerometer-derived information to determine time spent sitting/lying, standing and stepping and is validated in patients with RA. 17 The participants wore the monitor 24 hours per day for 7 days at baseline and by end of intervention, and recorded their daily sleeping time to separate sleep from waking sitting/lying time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices are typically worn on the front of the thigh, and use accelerometer-derived information regarding thigh position (towards gravity) to determine posture classification (i.e.,time spent sitting/lying/standing). [56]. Still, it is important to recognise that with the application of posture sensors, sedentary energy expenditure is inferred indirectly based on the assumed energy cost of sitting/lying (i.e., ≤1.5 METS) [46].…”
Section: Objective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its validity for quantifying step count and the number of sedentary time interruptions has been queried (i.e., underestimation by 26% and 36%, respectively) [56]. The validity of the Sensewear Armband (SWA) has also been examined, with data indicating this device to underestimate sedentary time in RA (as computed using manufacturer-derived proprietary algorithms) when compared with energy expenditure assessed via indirect calorimetry [61].…”
Section: Application and Validity Of Sedentary Behaviour Measurement mentioning
confidence: 99%