2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of the T-history method: A fundamental approach

Abstract: Està subjecte a una llicència de Reconeixement-NoComercial-SenseObraDerivada 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent work by Badenhorst & Cabeza 2017 [10], it was shown that the heat convection coefficient may vary largely in an air climate chamber.…”
Section: Discussion Of the T-history Methods Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent work by Badenhorst & Cabeza 2017 [10], it was shown that the heat convection coefficient may vary largely in an air climate chamber.…”
Section: Discussion Of the T-history Methods Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical expression In alternative formulations, this principle has been expressed in the form of different areas under the temperature versus time curve for the same temperature interval for PCM and reference, respectively [10,19].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 shows the comparative evolution of the melting peak temperatures, T m , against the different heating rates by considering the aforementioned two masses (low mass 7.9 mg and high mass 16.3 mg, respectively). It can be observed that the measured melting points, through the DSC tests for the small sample mass (7.9 mg), rather quickly approximates the melting peak temperature (i.e., 26 Also, for PureTemp 25 the comparison of melting peak temperatures, T m , against the various heating rates and two different masses (10.1 mg and 18.9 mg, respectively) is presented in Figure 10. As for RT25, the sample with the lower mass (10.1 mg) showed a less influence of the heating rate on the melting peak temperature (e.g., T m = 24.50 • C at 0.25 K/min and 24.25 • C at 0.125 K/min).…”
Section: Mass Of Sample Effect For Rt25 and Puretemp 25mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…THM easily allows to evaluate the heat capacity, temperature of melting/crystallization, enthalpy and phase change temperature. The accuracy and soundness of this method was evaluated by many researchers, see for example [26][27][28]. Hong et al [29] verified the accuracy of a modified THM for several PCMs, having different freezing patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%