Critical Assessment of the Chemical Space Covered by LC–HRMS Non-Targeted Analysis

Abstract

Non-targeted analysis (NTA) has emerged as a valuable approach for the comprehensive monitoring of chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) in the exposome. The NTA approach can theoretically identify compounds with diverse physicochemical properties and sources. Even though they are generic and have a wide scope, non-targeted analysis methods have been shown to have limitations in terms of their coverage of the chemical space, as the number of identified chemicals in each sample is very low (e.g., ≤5%). Investigating the chemical space that is covered by each NTA assay is crucial for understanding the limitations and challenges associated with the workflow, from the experimental methods to the data acquisition and data processing techniques. In this review, we examined recent NTA studies published between 2017 and 2023 that employed liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry. The parameters used in each study were documented, and the reported chemicals at confidence levels 1 and 2 were retrieved. The chosen experimental setups and the quality of the reporting were critically evaluated and discussed. Our findings reveal that only around 2% of the estimated chemical space was covered by the NTA studies investigated for this review. Little to no trend was found between the experimental setup and the observed coverage due to the generic and wide scope of the NTA studies. The limited coverage of the chemical space by the reviewed NTA studies highlights the necessity for a more comprehensive approach in the experimental and data processing setups in order to enable the exploration of a broader range of chemical space, with the ultimate goal of protecting human and environmental health. Recommendations for further exploring a wider range of the chemical space are given.

Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective

“…156 The analyst is also cautioned that no single instrumental method is capable of detecting all chemical compounds and that each step of the analysis could remove compounds present in the sample. 157 , 158 This is particularly relevant when a large suspect list consists of compounds with a wide range of properties. For example, an instrumental method suitable for the analysis of anionic PFAS may not be appropriate for emerging brominated flame retardants.…”

High-Efficiency Effect-Directed Analysis Leveraging Five High Level Advancements: A Critical Review

“…In practical applications of EDA, the bioactive fractions exhibit reduced complexity compared to the unfractionated solution but still retain a large number of compound features. The improvement of detection capabilities, such as the use of HRMS, will further increase the number of chemical features detected, ultimately leading to the identification of key toxicants like a needle in a haystack. , In addition, the core idea of toxicant identification and validation is to elucidate the relationship between potential key toxicants and their effects; however, insufficient evidence and poorly interpreted toxic contributions remain challenging, leading to failure in EDA. Accordingly, efficiently identifying and validating potential key toxicants in the unfractionated solution and active fractions have become critical barriers to a breakthrough in high-throughput and high-efficiency EDA.…”

Predicting the Activity of Unidentified Chemicals in Complementary Bioassays from the HRMS Data to Pinpoint Potential Endocrine Disruptors

“…However, contemporary scientific methods shed light on a more complex reality, leading to awareness that humans are exposed to a diverse mixture of chemicals. Fortunately, the advent of nontarget liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/HRMS) has enabled the simultaneous detection of numerous chemicals within real-world mixtures. − Despite this progress, only a fraction (up to 5%) of chemicals that humans are exposed to are unequivocally identified, − and information regarding the toxicity of identified chemicals is either insufficient or entirely absent . Therefore, significant gaps persist in the evaluation of the toxic effects associated with these detected chemicals.…”