2021
DOI: 10.1002/asna.202113872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical comments on publications by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae/supernovae and their candidates

Abstract: We critically discuss recent articles by S. Hoffmann and N. Vogt on historical novae and supernovae (SNe) as well as their list of "24 most promising events" "with rather high probability to be a nova" (Hoffmann et al., AN, 2020, 341, 79 (P3)). Their alleged positional accuracy of previously suggested historical nova/SN records is based on inhomogeneous datasets (Vogt et al.), but then used for the nova search in Hoffmann et al., AN, 2020, 341, 79 (P3). Their claim that previously only "point coordinates" fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best study of the Chinese records of SN 1181 is certainly the long and detailed chapter in SG2002, with this being authoritative and definitive. The most recent discussion of these same Chinese records appears in Ritter et al (2021), which unfortunately adopted most of its discussions and results from the thoroughly discredited source of Hoffman, Vogt, & Protte (2020), which has a high rate of bad errors of many kinds (Neuhäuser & Neuhäuser 2021). With this situation and with the new information on Pa 30 and supernovae, it is worthwhile re-examining the original Chinese and Japanese reports.…”
Section: The Ancient Chinese and Japanese Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best study of the Chinese records of SN 1181 is certainly the long and detailed chapter in SG2002, with this being authoritative and definitive. The most recent discussion of these same Chinese records appears in Ritter et al (2021), which unfortunately adopted most of its discussions and results from the thoroughly discredited source of Hoffman, Vogt, & Protte (2020), which has a high rate of bad errors of many kinds (Neuhäuser & Neuhäuser 2021). With this situation and with the new information on Pa 30 and supernovae, it is worthwhile re-examining the original Chinese and Japanese reports.…”
Section: The Ancient Chinese and Japanese Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discovery of a faint and transient event might be difficult. For this, mV$$ {m}_{\mathrm{V}}\lesssim $$ 1–3 has been often assumed previously (e.g., Clark & Stephenson 1977; Hertzog 1986; Neuhäuser & Neuhäuser 2021; Stephenson & Green 2009). To increase the number of possible candidates, we assume that unaided observers could catch an event with an apparent magnitude of 3.…”
Section: Association Of the Events With Remnants Of Astrophysical Tra...mentioning
confidence: 84%