Critical dimension control on I-line steppers

Schiwon, R.; Grandpierre, A.G.; Kubis, Michael; Schröder, U. Paul

doi:10.1117/12.596521

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The thickness repartition over the wafer has a strong linear component which cannot be found on coated bare wafers. It can be explained by the repartition mechanism of the resist upon the kerf area [2].…”

Section: Resist Thickness and CD Uniformitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to a specific local topography in the kerf, the resist repartition can sometime create specific PCI CD signatures which are completely different from the CD-Uniformity of chip critical structures [2].…”

Section: Control Structure Choicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Variations of critical track parameters can also result in CD mean instabilities [2]. Baking parameters are mainly set up to optimize resist profiles [3,4], but temperature deviations may also be of importance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Critical dimension variations of I-line processes due to swing effects

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As chip dimensions decrease, I-line processes remain of interest for most uncritical layers: they provide the needed performance at a low cost and high throughput. However the critical dimensions (CD) and overlay requirements for the newest technologies are much tighter than they used to be, reducing significantly the process windows. Sources of variations of CD range and CD mean should be well known and the process window set up so as to minimize the sensitivity to small variations.For lower resist thickness, although using partially dyed I-line resist, one may have to deal with huge swing effects. Resist thickness and stack variations are then the main contributors to the high CD distribution This article focuses on CD instabilities caused by resist thickness fluctuations in the case where a stack layer is subject to variations.The influence of resist thickness variations is first considered, pointing out the importance of thickness control methods. The real resist thickness repartition on stacked wafers depends not only on global coating uniformity but also on local topography. Some examples of resist repartition and its impact on CD-uniformity are provided. The added contributions of resist and stack to a global swing effect are then discussed on the basis of experimental data. Significant differences of swing behavior are experimentally observed between critical chip structures and the usually monitored PCI kerf structure. A simulation illustrates the effect of the local stack thickness and resist thickness and to better understand those differences, together with cross section thickness measurements. The choice of an appropriate CD control structure is finally dealt with.

show abstract

Section: Resist Thickness and CD Uniformitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Control Structure Choicementioning

confidence: 99%