1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb00552.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Discussion on Abortive Interspecific Crosses in Brassica

Abstract: In most interspecific hybridization among diploid Brassica species (n = 8, 9, 10), few or no hybrids are obtained, and the three crosses of tetraploid (n = 17, 18, 19) by diploid species are usually only partially successful, especially in one of the reciprocal crosses. Such a cross-incompatibility complex is explained in this paper by a polar-nuclei activation (PNA) hypothesis which proposes two reversible functions, a normal reproduction and a sexual barrier, of double fertilization in higher plants. The fir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower number of seeds per pod on maternal plants and the lower proportional seed development from Br(female) Bn(male) crosses than from the reciprocal crosses are in accordance with results from several other studies (seed number: reviewed by Nishiyama et al, 1991 andScheffler &Dale, 1994;proportional seed development: Röbbelen, 1966). They also match the common observation that hybridization and seed-set are more successful when the parent of the higher ploidy level (here B. napus) serves as the seed parent, and when an allodiploid (B. napus) is pollinated by its diploid progenitor (Stebbins, 1958).…”
Section: Fitness Componentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The lower number of seeds per pod on maternal plants and the lower proportional seed development from Br(female) Bn(male) crosses than from the reciprocal crosses are in accordance with results from several other studies (seed number: reviewed by Nishiyama et al, 1991 andScheffler &Dale, 1994;proportional seed development: Röbbelen, 1966). They also match the common observation that hybridization and seed-set are more successful when the parent of the higher ploidy level (here B. napus) serves as the seed parent, and when an allodiploid (B. napus) is pollinated by its diploid progenitor (Stebbins, 1958).…”
Section: Fitness Componentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…If it is assumed that the EBN values for both S. alba 2x and 4x and B. napus are different, the observed reciprocal differences and the difference between the crossability of S. alba 2x and S. alba 4x may be explained by their EBN ratios. However, the contradictory results of our work and those of others (Ch~vre et al, 1991;Heyn, 1977) indicate that the outcome of these intergeneric crosses can only in part be explained by the EBN theory or the PNA (polar-nuclei activation) hypothesis (Nishiyama et al, 1991). Other mechanisms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…When one of the parents was diploid, progeny were often obtained only when B. napus was used as the female parent in the backcross. Because of this unilateral incompatibility, which has been reported for both the initial interspecific hybridization and subsequent generations, flow of genes is most likely to be from related species into B. napus, and not the reverse (Nishiyama et al, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%