“…In [20,22] the universality of z was verified, obtaining z ≈ 2.6, but the leading scaling-correction exponent was not consistent with the static one, as predicted by the FT approach. Moreover, this result is inconsistent with the perturbative FT estimate obtained from analyses of the perturbative expansions [24,25,26,15,27,28,29] at two and three loops, which suggest z ≈ 2. 18.…”