Critical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315675381-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical entrepreneurship studies

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third route to take to renew planners' engagement with economic thinking is to establish cross-disciplinary dialogues between planning and the relatively young scientific field of 'critical entrepreneurship studies'. As Essers et al (2017,) indicate, "entrepreneurship research has become increasingly more hospitable towards alternative theoretical influences and methodological procedures" (p. 1). The mainstream of entrepreneurship research focuses on entrepreneurship as a rather market-based phenomenon or as a special form of conduct which triggers accumulation and venture creation that causes economic growth (ibid).…”
Section: Critical Entrepreneurship Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A third route to take to renew planners' engagement with economic thinking is to establish cross-disciplinary dialogues between planning and the relatively young scientific field of 'critical entrepreneurship studies'. As Essers et al (2017,) indicate, "entrepreneurship research has become increasingly more hospitable towards alternative theoretical influences and methodological procedures" (p. 1). The mainstream of entrepreneurship research focuses on entrepreneurship as a rather market-based phenomenon or as a special form of conduct which triggers accumulation and venture creation that causes economic growth (ibid).…”
Section: Critical Entrepreneurship Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-colonial aspects of entrepreneurship studies challenge "how entrepreneurship research is largely bound by Western organisational discourses" (Essers et al, 2017, p. 3) with the purpose "to call into question the hegemonic performativity of conventional discourse about heroic (white male) styles of leadership in entrepreneurship" (ibid., p.3). In this respect, it seems particularly interesting to look at the work of so-called policy entrepreneurs (Kingdon, 1995) who in the field of (global) urban policy purposefully look for new paths and mobilize other actors for their case.…”
Section: Critical Entrepreneurship Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…might contribute to the problems they are trying to eliminate' (Calas et al, 2009: 566). In this sense, the exploration undertaken here adds to the ongoing critical dialogues on entrepreneurship (among others, see Calas and Smircich, 2014;Calas et al, 2009;Essers et al, 2017) where scholars emphasize the contingent and contested nature of entrepreneurial activity; along with the need to locate it within historical and social contexts so as to resist the tendency to universalize entrepreneurship as a panacea for redressing all manner of trials and tribulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our research responds to calls to challenge the ideological foundations of entrepreneurship (Essers, et al, 2017). Research has been criticised for failing to unpack the ways in which ideologies rooted in neoliberalism and entrepreneurship interact (Ahl and Marlow, 2019;Baker and Welter, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%