2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.041304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical exponent for the quantum Hall transition

Abstract: We report an estimate $\nu = 2.593$ $[ {2.587,2.598} ]$ of the critical exponent of the Chalker-Coddington model of the integer quantum Hall effect that is significantly larger than previous numerical estimates and in disagreement with experiment. We conclude that models of non-interacting electrons cannot explain the critical phenomena of the integer quantum Hall effect.Comment: 4 pages. Final version. Journal reference and DOI adde

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
163
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
34
163
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We note the following conceptual difference with the usual MacKinnon-Kramer scaling: 15,16 The MacKinnon-Kramer scaling variable is a Lyapunov exponent, which is a nonnegative quantity. Our scaling variable ln |z 0 | changes sign at the phase transition, so it contains information on which side of the transition one is located.…”
Section: Discussion and Relation To The Critical Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note the following conceptual difference with the usual MacKinnon-Kramer scaling: 15,16 The MacKinnon-Kramer scaling variable is a Lyapunov exponent, which is a nonnegative quantity. Our scaling variable ln |z 0 | changes sign at the phase transition, so it contains information on which side of the transition one is located.…”
Section: Discussion and Relation To The Critical Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we demonstrate that this approach produces results consistent with earlier calculations based on the scaling of Lyapunov exponents. 16 To make contact with those earlier calculations, we use the same Chalker-Coddington network model 17,18 (rather than the tight-binding model used in the main text). The parameter that controls the plateau transition in the network model is the mixing angle α of the scattering phase shifts at the nodes of the network.…”
Section: Appendix B: Calculation Of the Critical Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consideration was based on the understanding that strong spread in p eliminates completely the interference effects, and thus reduces the analysis of the p-q model to the percolation problem, which predicts much smaller localization radius, ξ(p) ∼ 1/p 8/3 , Eq. (52). In order to test this expectation, we incorporated a strong spread in p into transfer-matrix calculation.…”
Section: B Zero Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nodes in the of the CC network also have a transparent meaning: they represent saddle points of the random potential, where equipotentials come as close as magnetic length. Various aspects of the Quantum Hall transition, relevant to experiment [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] , e.g., divergence of the localization radius (scaling 39,52,68 ), critical statistics of energy levels 53 , mesoscopic conductance fluctuations 54,55 , pointcontact conductance 56 , were studied theoretically using the CC model 57 . Testing the levitation scenario microscopically requires to construct a minimal weakly chiral network model, which captures the physics encoded in the system Eq.…”
Section: First Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the critical state at and the critical phenomena near the IQH transition are at the focus of intense experimental [8][9][10][11][12][13] and theoretical research. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In spite of much effort over several decades, an analytical treatment of most of the critical conducting states in disordered electronic systems, including in particular that of the mentioned IQH transition, has been elusive (although some proposals [14][15][16] have been put forward, but see Refs. 18 and 19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%