2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3889(200104)10:4<299::aid-andp299>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical exponents predicted by grouping of Feynman diagrams inϕ4 model

Abstract: Different perturbation theory treatments of the Ginzburg-Landau phase transition model are discussed. This includes a criticism of the perturbative renormalization group (RG) approach and a proposal of a novel method providing critical exponents consistent with the known exact solutions in two dimensions. The usual perturbation theory is reorganized by appropriate grouping of Feynman diagrams of ϕ 4 model with O(n) symmetry. As a result, equations for calculation of the two-point correlation function are obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
87
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same model, but without the external field h, has been discussed in Ref. 7), representing the ϕ 4 term as…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The same model, but without the external field h, has been discussed in Ref. 7), representing the ϕ 4 term as…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1)-6) This paper is devoted to the further development of our original diagrammatic method introduced in Ref. 7) to study the ϕ 4 phase transition model below the critical point. Our approach is based on a suitable grouping of Feynman diagrams; therefore, we shall call it the GFD theory.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…apparently is closer to the standard (Gaussian) theoretical value 1/2, as compared to the X Y model considered in [9,10]. Therefore we are looking for sufficiently stable methods, which would provide small enough statistical errors allowing to distinguish between ρ = 1/2 and ρ = 1/2 if a small deviation from the standard value really takes place, as expected from the theoretical treatment in [15][16][17] yielding 1/2 < ρ < 1 and 3/2 < λ ⊥ < 2 in three dimen-…”
Section: Magnetization and Longitudinal Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%