tests. On these 33 patients, ICT and CFF were applied. 35 healthy subjects served as controls for the ICT and CFF. RESULTS: Taking > 9 lures as positive ICT according to receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90.9%, 37.1%, 57.6%, 81.3% respectively. Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lures (22 ± 7.8 vs 11 ± 5.6, p < 0.001) or (56% vs 28%) and lower target response (90% vs 97%) compared with controls. For CFF taking < 37 Hz as cut-off, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 57.5%, 94.3%, 90.5% and 70.2%. We also found that CFF is less time consuming as compare to ICT. CONCLUSION: ICT and CFF are useful tools to assess MHE. CFF to be less time to consume, less sensitive but more specific than ICT.
INTRODUCTIONHepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome present in patients with chronic or acute liver disease after exclusion of other brain diseases. According to recent guidelines (AASLD/EASL 2014), hepatic encephalopathy is a brain dysfunction caused by liver insufficiency and/or portosystemic shunting; it manifests as a wide spectrum of neurological or psychiatric abnormalities ranging from subclinical alterations to coma [1] . Patients with cirrhosis with normal neurologic and mental examination can present minimal forms of HE, showing intellectual function impairment that cannot be detected through general clinical examination but can be unveiled using specific neuropsychologic and neurophysiologic tests [2] . MHE has significant negative impact on