2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical heat flux and Leidenfrost temperature on hemispherical stainless steel surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) was used to theoretically predict the diameter based on the inner droplet dispenser diameter and liquid properties. From the calculation, the droplet diameter was approximately 3.628 mm which was similar with our previous report [15].…”
Section: Experimental Conditions and Related Formulasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2) was used to theoretically predict the diameter based on the inner droplet dispenser diameter and liquid properties. From the calculation, the droplet diameter was approximately 3.628 mm which was similar with our previous report [15].…”
Section: Experimental Conditions and Related Formulasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For easy understanding, if we can increase this Leidenfrost temperature in the boiling curve, it means that we can improve the cooling capabilities in thermal application system. A few number of researchers had conducted drop impact research [10][11][12][13][14] and Leidenfrost studies [15][16][17] in order to study this complicated phenomena. For instance, Illias et al [15] conducted an experimental work using hemispherical surface material made from stainless steel (304) to study the Leidenfrost temperature during liquid-solid contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data was recorded for six (6) times and the average reading was also calculated. The experimental apparatus is quite similar with our previous report [20][21][22].…”
Section: Experimental Apparatussupporting
confidence: 72%
“…They found that neither the existing capillary regime nor viscous regime identified for droplet impacts on impermeable surfaces (or a combination of these regimes) could describe β max for droplet impact on a porous surface over a wide range of We. Other researchers such as Illias et al [16][17][18][19][20][21], Rosman et al [22], Mitsutake et al [23], Tsuboyama et al [24] and Hasan et al [25][26] also conducted a few experimental works regarding droplet impact research in order to improve the understanding regarding the relationship between droplet impact and hot surfaces. In this paper, we focus our investigation in finding the Critical Heat Flux (CHF) by using three (3) different types of material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%