2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
327
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 654 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
327
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar shape of the contact boundary for fused silica was detected with use of the post-mortem method proposed in [24]. The measurement of residual imprints to estimate the contact area was advised also in [39].…”
Section: Specification Of the Contact Area With Use Of Post-mortem Mementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Similar shape of the contact boundary for fused silica was detected with use of the post-mortem method proposed in [24]. The measurement of residual imprints to estimate the contact area was advised also in [39].…”
Section: Specification Of the Contact Area With Use Of Post-mortem Mementioning
confidence: 68%
“…The Hertzian analysis is well suited to the nano-scratch testing of DLC films with spherical probes with an end radius of 5 µm or greater due to their intrinsic low friction and high H/E so that contact remains elastic or close to it over a wide load range. Plastic deformation in the sample beneath a spherical indenter can be first expected to occur when P m ~1.1Y at a depth of ~0.47a [24,29,30]. The mean pressure at yield (P m ) has been converted to a yield stress, Y, using the relationship that Y = P m /1.1.…”
Section: Nano-scratch Behaviour (R = 5 M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a drawback of the indentation test, if the objective is to identify bulk material properties, is its sensitivity to low scale artefacts such as sensor sensitivity, surface roughness, imperfect indenter geometry, and material heterogeneity [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. These artefacts, independently from the assumptions on the bulk material behaviour, lead to deviations from the ideal F-h curve predicted by the identification models based on Eq.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if initial contact, i.e. zero penetration depth, is detected by the indentation device by a sharp rise of load [15,19], the penetration depth for a given load will show an offset h offset,R from the penetration depth measured in the case of a perfectly smooth surface, corresponding to the compression of the asperities [7,14], such as presented schematically in Fig.1. Moreover, this offset as well as the necessary load for the compression of asperities is dependent on material properties, surface roughness, and the point of initial contact, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%