2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(99)00059-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical source area controls on water quality in an agricultural watershed located in the Chesapeake Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
158
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
158
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Correl et al 1980;Neill 1989;Whitmore et al 1992;Burt et al 1993;Haycock 1995;Pekárová & Pekár 1996;Worral & Burt 1999;Pionke et al 2000;Ferrier 2001;Lenhart et al 2003;Matejicek et al 2003;Buck et al 2004;Doležal & Kvítek 2004;Oenema et al 2004;Poor et al 2007; Krause et al 2008). Higher nitrate amounts washed out of arable and together drained land (in comparison to other agricultural land use types) have several possible causes and explanations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correl et al 1980;Neill 1989;Whitmore et al 1992;Burt et al 1993;Haycock 1995;Pekárová & Pekár 1996;Worral & Burt 1999;Pionke et al 2000;Ferrier 2001;Lenhart et al 2003;Matejicek et al 2003;Buck et al 2004;Doležal & Kvítek 2004;Oenema et al 2004;Poor et al 2007; Krause et al 2008). Higher nitrate amounts washed out of arable and together drained land (in comparison to other agricultural land use types) have several possible causes and explanations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losses of P originate from a small proportion of a catchment known as critical source areas (CSAs), where a high risk of P mobilization and transport coincides with high soil P content. Accurate identification of areas that contribute to such diffuse pollution in a catchment should be highly prioritized for control, treatment, and remediation purposes (Pionke et al 2000). This is in line with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) (2000/60/EC) requirement of cost-effective approaches in the process of achieving ''good ecological status'' of water bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Na microbacia de Ribeirão Marins (SP), utilizada para atividades de agricultura e pecuária, foram encontrados valores de turbidez entre 9 e 19 UNT, no período seco, e de 15 a 26 UNT, no período chuvoso, além de concentrações de amônia e nitrato que ultrapassaram os valores máximos preconizados pela norma atribuídos ao aporte dos nutrientes provenientes do processo erosivo do solo e de lixiviações (LUCAS et al, 2010). Na bacia hidrográfica de Chesapeake, Estados Unidos, o uso de um terço da área com atividade agrícola foi responsável por um aporte de 58% de fósforo no rio, relacionado ao escoamento superficial do nutriente (PIONKE et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified