2021
DOI: 10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i11/11529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Thinking Skills in Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even as we increased the difficulty along the process, the students were still willing to collect their SCoins. This proves the effectiveness of gamification in motivating them to learn and solve more complicated questions that foster the process of higher-order thinking, such as critical thinking, to develop, which is aligned with Dwyer (2018); Bourke (2019); Novitaningrum and Lestari (2020); Tzelepi et al (2020); Nor (2021); Heliawati et al (2022) and Angelelli et al (2023). Though the classes were online and the students were not very familiar with or fond of this circumstance, critical thinking could still be fostered using elements of both approaches online since it was shown that students' critical thinking skills, in general, were improved, as found by Tzelepi et al (2020) and Palloan et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even as we increased the difficulty along the process, the students were still willing to collect their SCoins. This proves the effectiveness of gamification in motivating them to learn and solve more complicated questions that foster the process of higher-order thinking, such as critical thinking, to develop, which is aligned with Dwyer (2018); Bourke (2019); Novitaningrum and Lestari (2020); Tzelepi et al (2020); Nor (2021); Heliawati et al (2022) and Angelelli et al (2023). Though the classes were online and the students were not very familiar with or fond of this circumstance, critical thinking could still be fostered using elements of both approaches online since it was shown that students' critical thinking skills, in general, were improved, as found by Tzelepi et al (2020) and Palloan et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Even though drawing conclusions came second in its level of improvement, it scored the lowest among the other subskills in the post-test. One possible reason is that the test for this subskill consists of three sections, which contains a multiple-choice question that needed careful consideration and context-rich questions that might hinder their engagement in thinking about the question, as mentioned by Nor (2021). Table 7 shows that there were no longer any students at a poor level, while the number of students at an excellent level drastically increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efektivitas blended learning, yang merupakan metode pembelajaran yang dibantu oleh teknologi, juga telah diteliti dalam kaitannya dengan peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa (Sukma & Priatna, 2021). Sebuah tinjauan literatur sistematis tentang keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam pendidikan menemukan bahwa banyak tujuan pendidik termasuk mempersiapkan siswa untuk berpikir kritis, yang juga merupakan kualitas yang dicari oleh pemberi kerja dari lulusan universitas (Nor & Sihes, 2021).…”
Section: A Pemikiran Kritis Pada Siswaunclassified
“…Laar et al [9] state that the role of the teacher in preparing students' critical thinking skills in the learning process is by the characteristics of constructivism itself, where the teacher has various roles that can be used in helping students during the learning process. Research Alsaleh et al [4], Nor and Sihes [10], and Rogti [11] also describe the important role of teachers in training and developing students' critical thinking skills. The important role of the teacher can be carried out by carrying out action research [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%