2017
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1351575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critically assessing digital documents: materiality and the interpretative role of software

Abstract: As a contribution to the ongoing tradition of critically assessing documents for research, this paper aims to highlight materiality as a key factor in the co-shaping of knowledge derived from digital documents. The paper first builds upon prior debates in document studies with work from the fields of Science and Technology Studies, and Communication Studies, to establish the role of document materiality in the interpretative process. By first establishing digital documents' material reality as electrical signa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People nowadays can convey information and broadcast live through Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter and others. Thus, this is in line with Allen-Robertson (2018, p. 1738 explores that digitization projects offer people with a comparative description of the ways in which the material form might impact on the range of interpretative affordances, not necessarily as a 'loss' but a shift in the interpretative possibility afforded.…”
Section: Millennial Erasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…People nowadays can convey information and broadcast live through Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter and others. Thus, this is in line with Allen-Robertson (2018, p. 1738 explores that digitization projects offer people with a comparative description of the ways in which the material form might impact on the range of interpretative affordances, not necessarily as a 'loss' but a shift in the interpretative possibility afforded.…”
Section: Millennial Erasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Conspicuously absent in the articles reviewed—other than a few articles that analysed medical school webpages—digital documents have been extolled by many as the future of documentary research because of the opportunities they offer. However, digital documents ‘are highly mediated objects with a materiality that plays a significant, if often unseen contributory role in the interpretative process’ (p. 1743) 64 . Recognising that digital documents are different from print documents allows us to ask about the ‘consequences of form’ (p. 96) 65 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, digital documents 'are highly mediated objects with a materiality that plays a significant, if often unseen contributory role in the interpretative process' (p. 1743). 64 Recognising that digital documents are different from print documents allows us to ask about the 'consequences of form' (p. 96). 65 If the medium is important, those working with documents need to consider 'the ontological status of digital text … that will ground future work discussing the specific analytical affordances offered by digital texts' (p. 78).…”
Section: What Guidelines or Standards Are Needed To Strengthen Da Pra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Allen-Robertson, digital documents "arise and persist as signals confined within software and hardware assemblages" (2017, p. 1733). Only the "increasingly userfriendly software that express and mimic the typographic conventions of print culture" (Allen-Robertson, 2018, p. 1733) establishes a familiarity between the user and the document while the digital technologies behind remain "enigmatic black boxes for most researchers working in the field of philology and textual criticism" (Appollon et al, 2014, p. 1). Therefore many scholars in the humanities can only relate to and analyze what we can experience and observe on screen level, even if we are aware of the fact that digital documents only are able to "mimic prior forms [.…”
Section: Digital Documents and A New Awareness Of Materialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“….] because software has interpreted the data into such a form" (Allen-Robertson, 2018, p. 1738. Although the computational turn in the humanities has led to more interdisciplinary work combining "insights and methods from computer science with methods, questions and theories from the humanities" (Berry and Fagerjord, 2017, p. 26), much scholarly work in the humanities is still done in a more traditional way with close reading of a limited number of textsprinted or electronicas a core method.…”
Section: Digital Documents and A New Awareness Of Materialitymentioning
confidence: 99%