2008
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65577-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cronobacter gen. nov., a new genus to accommodate the biogroups of Enterobacter sakazakii, and proposal of Cronobacter sakazakii gen. nov., comb. nov., Cronobacter malonaticus sp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov., Cronobacter genomospecies 1, and of three subspecies, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis subsp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis subsp. nov. and Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi subsp. nov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
276
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 502 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
15
276
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, the taxonomic reclassification of the species E. sakazakii into the genus Cronobacter [6] described 5 species, which were differentiated according to the biotyping scheme; C. sakazakii (biotypes 1-5, 7-9, 11, 13 & 14), C. turicensis (biotypes 16, 16a and 16b), C. muytjensii (biotype 15), C. dublinensis (biotypes 6, 10 and 12), and Cronobacter genomospecies 1. Soon afterwards, Iversen et al [7] proposed the additional species C. malonaticus. This was composed of three biotypes (5, 9 & 14) which had previously been assigned to C. sakazakii; Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, the taxonomic reclassification of the species E. sakazakii into the genus Cronobacter [6] described 5 species, which were differentiated according to the biotyping scheme; C. sakazakii (biotypes 1-5, 7-9, 11, 13 & 14), C. turicensis (biotypes 16, 16a and 16b), C. muytjensii (biotype 15), C. dublinensis (biotypes 6, 10 and 12), and Cronobacter genomospecies 1. Soon afterwards, Iversen et al [7] proposed the additional species C. malonaticus. This was composed of three biotypes (5, 9 & 14) which had previously been assigned to C. sakazakii; Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many species of this family are of considerable economic importance due to their pathogenic effects on agriculture and livestock (Janda & Abbott, 2006). Currently, there are more than 35 genera described in this family (Dauga, 2002;Janda, 2006), including the recently described genus Cronobacter (Iversen et al, 2008), which was previous recognized as Farmer's Enterobacter sakazakii biogroups 1-4, 7, 8, 11 and13 (Iversen et al, 2007, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strains from these three subspecies were grouped together with sequence analysis based on 16S rRNA, F-AFLP and ribotyping 22 . Based on these results the three biogroups were designated as three subspecies 33 . These subspecies are generally dulcitol negative and indole production is variable 32 .…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subspecies was accepted as a distinct species, namely Cronobacter malonaticus after subsequent DNA-DNA hybridisation indicated that the C. malonaticus strains had DNA homology values of less than 70 % with the other Cronobacter species 33 . There is a high level of similarity between C. sakazakii and C. malonaticus and sequence analysis based on 16S rRNA is not sufficient to distinguish between these two species 22,31,33 . Biochemical differentiation between the two species can be accomplished by testing for the utilisation of malonate, although a small number of C. sakazakii strains do utilize malonate 34 .…”
Section: Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%