2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-014-9351-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop water stress index derived from multi-year ground and aerial thermal images as an indicator of potato water status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the drifting CWSI range can be anchored in advance with the help of auxiliary data, such as the air temperature. T dry can be predicted by T air + threshold temperature (e.g., 5 • C) in the empirical method [16,[20][21][22]. If the estimated T dry in GMM distribution is lower than T dry predicted by T air , it would indicate non-severe crop water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the drifting CWSI range can be anchored in advance with the help of auxiliary data, such as the air temperature. T dry can be predicted by T air + threshold temperature (e.g., 5 • C) in the empirical method [16,[20][21][22]. If the estimated T dry in GMM distribution is lower than T dry predicted by T air , it would indicate non-severe crop water stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, a temperature histogram is generated from TIR image subset of each sub-region. This study assumes that Twet can be taken from the coldest part of the histogram from the TIR image [16], and Tdry is also the temperature of a non-transpiring leaf, which can be derived from the highest part of the histogram. Table 2.…”
Section: Adaptive Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quadratic polynomial equation between CWSI and gs was the same with the results got by Aladenol and Madramootoo (2014) on bell pepper, but was different from the negatively linear relationship between CWSI and gs reported by Möller et al (2007) or Zia et al (2011). It might be because the data were collected on different sampling data, that might result in the difference in relations W1 70%θs1 65%θs1 60%θs1 70%θs2 75%θs2 80%θs3 70%θs3 W2 70%θs1 60%θs1 55%θs1 65%θs2 70%θs2 75%θs3 70%θs3 W3 70%θs1 55%θs1 50%θs1 60%θs2 65%θs2 70%θs3 70%θs3 W4 70%θs1 50%θs1 45%θs1 55%θs2 60%θs2 65%θs3 70%θs3 θ between CWSI and gs among sampling date as reported by Rud et al (2014) on potato. Based on the quadratic polynomial relationships between CWSI and leaf physiological indexes, the critical CWSI values for decline in Pn were higher than those for decline in Tr or gs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices based on leaf or canopy temperature are widely used in crop water deficit diagnosis since 1970's with the advent of hand-held thermometers Jackson et al, 1981;Jones, 2004;Gontia and Tiwari, 2008;Peng et al, 2011), such as stress degree days (SDD) Patil et al, 2014), canopy temperature variability (CTV) (Clawson and Blad, 1982;Gonzalez-Dugo et al, 2006) and crop water stress index (CWSI). CWSI has been applied in many different crops, such as wheat (Yuan et al, 2004;Gontia and Tiwari, 2008;Li et al, 2010), cotton (Silva and Rao, 2005;O'shaughnessy et al, 2011), maize (Anda, 2009;Li et al, 2010;Taghvaeian et al, 2012), bean (Erdem et al, 2006b), and some vegetables (Cremona et al, 2004;Simsek et al, 2005;Erdem et al, 2010;Aladenola and Madramootoo, 2014;Rud et al, 2014) or fruits (Erdem et al, 2006a;Paltineanu et al, 2009). Early researchers mostly scanned several pots by hand-held infrared thermometer under field to detect the crop water status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%