Cross-associations between physical activity and sedentary time on metabolic health: a comparative assessment using self-reported and objectively measured activity

Thakkar, Niels A.; Jamnik, Veronica; Ardern, Chris I.

doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdy060

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Importante, la inactividad física y el comportamiento sedentario son factores de riesgo independientes asociados a mortalidad 8 . De hecho, una persona puede ser al mismo tiempo físicamente activa (cumple las recomendaciones de actividad moderada y/o vigorosa) y sedentaria (acumula > 8 h/d de comportamiento sedentario) 11 . Es por ello esencial diferenciar inactividad física y sedentarismo para establecer los riesgos para la salud de la población.…”

unclassified

“…yor prevalencia de síndrome metabólico11 . Importante, las personas inactivas/sedentarias -ademáspresentaron mayor prevalencia de enfermedades crónicas, obesidad, obesidad abdominal, presión arterial elevada, glicemia elevada, trigliceridemia elevada, y HDL-C disminuido11 . Estos resultados demuestran como la combinación de los factores de riesgo asociados al patrón de actividad perjudican la salud.…”

unclassified

“…La medición objetiva de la actividad física en todo su rango de intensidades (desde comportamiento sedentario hasta actividades vigorosas) permitirá determinar de manera más precisa el riesgo para la salud de la población. En Chile, debiésemos aspirar a este tipo de mediciones en el futuro, como ya se hace en otros países11,18 .En futuras encuestas, se debiese informar sobre inactividad física usando los resultados del GPAQ…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Inactividad física versus sedentarismo: análisis de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile 2016-2017

Fernández‐Verdejo

Suárez-Reyes

2021

Rev. méd. Chile

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inactividad física versus sedentarismo: análisis de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile 2016-2017 rodrigo Fernández-verdejo 1,a , MóniCA suárez-reyes 2,b Physical inactivity versus sedentariness: analysis of the chilean national health survey 2016-2017 Background: Physical inactivity and sedentariness are independent risk factors for mortality. Physical inactivity is defined as engaging in insufficient moderate/vigorous physical activity (i.e. not meeting the WHO's recommendations). Sedentariness is defined according to sedentary behavior; evidence suggests that > 8 h/d could serve to consider a person as sedentary. The Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017 (NHS), using a single question (Question-NHS), considered as "sedentary" those who did not engage in sports or physical activity for ≥ 30 min, ≥ 3 times/wk. Thus, it attempted to estimate sedentariness without considering sedentary behavior. Aim: To determine the prevalence of physical inactivity and sedentariness in Chile, and to contrast such results with the Question-NHS. Material and Methods: We analyzed data from 5564 participants of the 2016-2017 NHS, aged ≥ 18 years. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to determine moderate/vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior. We defined physical inactivity as having < 600 MET × min/ wk of moderate/vigorous physical activity, and sedentariness as having > 8 h/d of sedentary behavior. Results: The prevalences [95% confidence intervals] of physical inactivity and sedentariness were 32% [29][30][31][32][33][34] and 6% [5][6][7] respectively, while 3% [2][3][4] were both physically inactive and sedentary. The Question-NHS classified 88% [86][87][88][89] as "sedentary", but among them, 35% were physically inactive and 6% were sedentary. Conclusions: One third of adults are inactive, one out of ten is sedentary, and one out of twenty is inactive and sedentary. The Question-NHS overestimates the population at risk.

show abstract

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Inactividad física versus sedentarismo: análisis de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile 2016-2017

Fernández‐Verdejo

Suárez-Reyes

2021

Rev. méd. Chile

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The literature shows that the monitoring of patients' mobility in an inpatient setting can give information similar to advanced and time-consuming techniques, such as behavioral mapping, and it can be useful to collect the activity levels of hospitalized patients [31]. A lower level of activity during hospitalization can lead to a loss of muscle quantity and quality and can seriously hurt the rehabilitation process and patient's health conditions [32][33][34]. A review on wearable sensors for the quantification of, and feedback on, lower extremity movement found that there may be substantial clinical benefits, with more work needed with respect to natural environments and longer monitoring periods [35].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool

Negrini

Gasperini

Guanziroli

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring the real-life mobility of stroke patients could be extremely useful for clinicians. Step counters are a widely accessible, portable, and cheap technology that can be used to monitor patients in different environments. The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost commercial tri-axial accelerometer-based step counter for stroke patients and to determine the best positioning of the step counter (wrists, ankles, and waist). Ten healthy subjects and 43 post-stroke patients were enrolled and performed four validated clinical tests (10 m, 50 m, and 6 min walking tests and timed up and go tests) while wearing five step counters in different positions while a trained operator counted the number of steps executed in each test manually. Data from step counters and those collected manually were compared using the intraclass coefficient correlation and mean average percentage error. The Bland–Altman plot was also used to describe agreement between the two quantitative measurements (step counter vs. manual counting). During walking tests in healthy subjects, the best reliability was found for lower limbs and waist placement (intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs) from 0.46 to 0.99), and weak reliability was observed for upper limb placement in every test (ICCs from 0.06 to 0.38). On the contrary, in post-stroke patients, moderate reliability was found only for the lower limbs in the 6 min walking test (healthy ankle ICC: 0.69; pathological ankle ICC: 0.70). Furthermore, the Bland–Altman plot highlighted large average discrepancies between methods for the pathological group. However, while the step counter was not able to reliably determine steps for slow patients, when applied to the healthy ankle of patients who walked faster than 0.8 m/s, it counted steps with excellent precision, similar to that seen in the healthy subjects (ICCs from 0.36 to 0.99). These findings show that a low-cost accelerometer-based step counter could be useful for measuring mobility in select high-performance patients and could be used in clinical and real-world settings.

show abstract

Impact of Time in Motion on Blood Pressure Regulation Among Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-associations between physical activity and sedentary time on metabolic health: a comparative assessment using self-reported and objectively measured activity

Abstract: Using accelerometer data, the inactive/sedentary group was at higher risk for 1+ disease and abdominal obesity only, whereas the active/sedentary and inactive/non-sedentary groups were not at higher risk for any health outcome.

Cited by 7 publications

References 57 publications

Inactividad física versus sedentarismo: análisis de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile 2016-2017

Inactividad física versus sedentarismo: análisis de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile 2016-2017

Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool

Impact of Time in Motion on Blood Pressure Regulation Among Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About