2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-border effects of R&D tax incentives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sequence of cleaning steps is applied to the ORBIS database in order to arrive at the baseline sample used in this paper. This approach largely follows the cleaning procedures set out by Kalemli-Ozcan et al (2015 [32]), Millot et al (2020[2]), and Sorbe and Johansson (2017 [33]). The changes in the distribution of observations across jurisdictions are visualised step by step in Figures B.…”
Section: Box 2 Data Cleaning Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sequence of cleaning steps is applied to the ORBIS database in order to arrive at the baseline sample used in this paper. This approach largely follows the cleaning procedures set out by Kalemli-Ozcan et al (2015 [32]), Millot et al (2020[2]), and Sorbe and Johansson (2017 [33]). The changes in the distribution of observations across jurisdictions are visualised step by step in Figures B.…”
Section: Box 2 Data Cleaning Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Industrial policy targeting the heavy and chemical industries in Korea during the 1970s. Kim, Lee and Shin (2021 [71]) use a difference-in-differences setting, comparing treated and non-treated industries and regions. They show that affected regions have higher output and labour productivity.…”
Section: Scarce Evidence On Causal Effects Of Targeted Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, DID "differences out" the pre-policy differences between both groups and the common time trend. For an example, see the evaluation of Korean industrial policies targeting the heavy and chemical industries by Kim, Lee and Shin (2021 [71]).…”
Section: Difference-in-differences (Did)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In some instances, the extent of preferential tax treatment granted increases with the size of the investment either via extended periods of relief or lower reduced tax rates (González Cabral, Appelt and Hanappi, forthcoming [19]). 6 Other design features such as the requirement to reinvest income subject to relief can also ensure a continuing link to substance. In addition, for tax incentives that may provide relief to mobile tax bases, such as intellectual property regimes, the OECD/G20 BEPS Action 5 minimum standard, requires income to be linked to economic substance in order for a taxpayer to benefit from preferential tax treatment (OECD, 2015 [20]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome, investment or size conditions needs to be carefully designed, as they may be costly to administer and validate 6. In such cases, the incentives offer more competitive rates to larger performers, which can reinforce tax competition pressures 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%