2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0553-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-border response of mosses to heavy metal atmospheric deposition in Southeastern Bulgaria and European Turkey

Abstract: First cross-border atmospheric pollution of 11 heavy metals and toxic elements assessed by Hypnum cupressiforme was reported for a part of Southeastern Europe (Southeastern Bulgaria and European Turkey). Moss monitoring technique followed the main requirements of European Moss Survey. Moss samples were collected in April 2006 both in Bulgaria and Turkey. Concentration of Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Sb, V, and Zn were determined by ICP-AES. Interlaboratory parallel calibration (exchanged four moss samples f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, lithogenic component as possible source of heavy metals in Bourgas settled dusts can be discarded. Another possible explanation for the very high regional concentrations of As and heavy metals is identified by moss monitoring of long‐distance trans‐boundary pollution from Turkey coming from two glass factories [ Coskun et al , 2009]. On the other hand, extremely high content of As is accompanied by very high Cu content in the sample B2o from Burgas, suggesting that this pollution may be caused by emissions from Cu‐smelting industry in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, lithogenic component as possible source of heavy metals in Bourgas settled dusts can be discarded. Another possible explanation for the very high regional concentrations of As and heavy metals is identified by moss monitoring of long‐distance trans‐boundary pollution from Turkey coming from two glass factories [ Coskun et al , 2009]. On the other hand, extremely high content of As is accompanied by very high Cu content in the sample B2o from Burgas, suggesting that this pollution may be caused by emissions from Cu‐smelting industry in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major removal mechanisms for arsenic suspended in air include gravitational dry deposition and wet scavenging (Andreae et al, 1998;Tsopelas et al, 2008;Coskun et al, 2009;Harmens et al, 2010). In dry deposition, arsenic usually presents as a mixture of arsenites As (III) and arsenates As (V) (Mandal andSuzuki, 2002, Serbula et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar studies were carried out in 2000 by the Vysehrad Group countries—Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia (Suchara et al 2007). Biomonitoring studies utilising mosses include also the local cases, such as a pilot study comparing the sorption properties of various moss species in Latvia 1993 (Ceburnis et al 1997); determination of the concentrations of heavy metals in moss samples collected around the industrial facilities in Estonia, in 1992, 1997 and 2002, carried out to estimate the distribution of the deposition of these metals in the vicinity of their sources (Liiv and Kaasik 2004); studies in the Romanian city of Baia Mare hosting several copper, zinc and lead works (Culicov et al 2002); studies in Bulgaria and the European part of Turkey (Coşkun et al 2009); studies in Greece (Yurukova et al 2009) and studies in Belgrade, where moss samples collected in autumn 2004 were analysed using the neutron activation analysis (INAA) to determine 36 elements and to indicate their main sources—fuel burning for energy production and vehicle emissions (Aničić et al 2007). Determination of heavy metals accumulated in mosses were also carried out in Vietnam (Nguyen-Viet et al 2007), Pakistan (Rahman et al 2000) and in the South Ural (Smirnov et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%