Cross-Country Growth Empirics and Model Uncertainty: An Overview

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of empirical cross-country growth literature. The paper begins with describing the basic framework used in recent empirical crosscountry growth research. Even though this literature was mainly inspired by endogenous growth theories, the neoclassical growth model is still the workhorse for cross-country growth empirics. The second part of the paper emphasises model uncertainty, which is indeed immense but generally neglected in the empirical cross-country growth literature. The most outstanding feature of the literature is that a large number of factors have been suggested as fundamental growth determinants. Together with the small sample property, this leads to an important problem: model uncertainty. The questions which factors are more fundamental in explaining growth dynamics and hence growth differences are still the subject of academic research. Recent attempts based on general-to-specific modeling or model averaging are promising but have their own limits. Finally, the paper highlights the implications of model uncertainty for policy evaluation.Published as Survey and Overview JEL O41, O47, C21, C23, C52

Economic Performance and Competitiveness Indicators: The Case of African Economies

“…There are some general obstacles to identifying key drivers of economic growth that should be taken to account. Ulaşan (2012) presents an informative review of econometric approaches to the identification of key factors of economic growth. He shows that, given the current strand of so-called new growth theories, the pool of possible growth determinants is virtually unlimited.…”

Bayesian Averaging vs. Dynamic Factor Models for Forecasting Economic Aggregates with Tendency Survey Data

“…Clearly, the set of indicators that would serve best as determinants for unemployment need not be the same as those for CPI or rate of GDP growth, thus each of the vectors should be selected individually. The economic rationale in this case would be not only subjective but also the selection would require adopting a general-to-specific approach, which has been widely criticised (see, e.g., Ulaşan, 2012). Hence, the averaging approach was adopted using the Bayesian model for the purpose, which when OLS is used as estimator, degenerates to Bayesian averaging of classical estimates.…”

Transforming innovation models in European regions: Breaking out of path dependency and growing faster?

“…Regions develop at different rates, and a variety of endogenous and exogenous factors shape their development paths. Although Ulaşan (2012) claims that none of these factors is more significant than the others, since Schumpeter (1934) identified the role of innovative entrepreneurs in regional development, innovative activity has become the most effective way for regions to grow. Subsequent theories confirmed the role of innovativeness in speeding up the development process.…”