2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Asians with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore

Abstract: The Singapore English and Chinese KOOS were well accepted and demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity in Asian patients with knee OA in Singapore.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
97
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
22
97
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Minimal (less than 5%) or no missing data 39 and high prevalence of patient completion (99.5%) 22 support the ease of use of the KOOS. The items pertaining to the function in sport and recreation subscale were not applicable for 74% of patients in 1 study and were thus treated as missing items.…”
Section: Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…16 Minimal (less than 5%) or no missing data 39 and high prevalence of patient completion (99.5%) 22 support the ease of use of the KOOS. The items pertaining to the function in sport and recreation subscale were not applicable for 74% of patients in 1 study and were thus treated as missing items.…”
Section: Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8 and the English version (ICC = 0.65). 39 In addition, the knee-related quality of life subscale of the Chinese version achieved an ICC value of 0.60. 39 It is important to note that de Groot et al 8 only evaluated the reliability using patients who had a revision of the TKA.…”
Section: Literature Search and Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The KOOS has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. 35 The Lysholm Knee Scale measures knee symptoms (disability) and physical findings (impairment). 10 It contains 8 questions with a 100-point rating scale, with higher scores representing greater function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%