Cross-Cultural Comparison of Sensory Preferences in Romantic Attraction

Abstract

Various physical characteristics of a partner-visual, auditory, tactile and kinetic, olfactory, and gustatory-can affect human mate choice and romantic attraction. Evolutionary factors, as well as socioeconomic and cultural parameters play their role in these sensory preferences. A series of studies in societies varying in social, economic, and cultural parameters (10 samples in six countries with 2740 participants in total) explored cross-cultural similarities and differences of sensory preferences that people have in their romantic attraction. The results revealed that social development of countries and their cultural parameters allow prediction of preferences of certain sensory parameters in one's romantic partner's appearance. The most general distinctions of sensory preferences are in the societies with different degree of modernization, along with corresponding social and cultural parameters. The stable biologically and evolutionarily determined characteristics of physical appearance, such as smell, skin, body, etc., are important for one's sensory preferences in romantic attraction in less modernized societies, which are characterized by greater power distance, lower individualism, indulgence, and emancipative values. On the other hand, the characteristics of romantic partner's appearance, which are more flexible and easier to change, such as expressive behavior, dress, dance, etc., are more important in more modernized societies with lower Power Distance, high value of Individualism, Indulgence, and Emancipation.

Does Online Dating Promotion Vary Across Cultures? A Cross-cultural Analysis of Homepage Advertisements of Online Dating Services in 51 Countries

“…Research linking these two dimensions of Hofstede’s model and relationships has also been sparse. While some studies have shown that individuals from countries with varying time orientation and indulgence levels differ in their partner choices and relational goals (Karandashev et al, 2020; Lu et al, 2021), there is no conclusive evidence if and how their dating motivations and practices differ. Because of this lack of research, we propose a research question to explore possible associations between the two cultural dimensions from Hofstede’s model and corresponding advertising appeals.…”

Gender Differences in Estimates of Love Styles for Self and Others

“…The research about romantic love has predominantly concentrated in its multidimensional complexity (Clark & Mills, 1979;Hatfield & Walster, 1978;Hazan & Shaver, 1987;Karandashev et al 2020;Sternberg, 1986). The research presented in this work employed the comprehensive love theory developed by Lee (1973Lee ( , 1977Lee ( , 1988.…”

“Time Slows Down Whenever You Are Around” for Women but Not for Men

“…Typically, it refers to positive reactions that can be divided into four components: cognitive (positive thoughts and beliefs), affective (positive feelings and emotions), motivational (a desire to approach the other), and behavioral (standing or sitting closer) ( Wurst and Back, 2018 ). Cross-cultural studies on attraction have demonstrated that the bases of relationships are not random and are strongly linked to basic mechanisms of attraction ( Eastwick, 2013 ; Zarubko et al, 2016 ; Karandashev et al, 2020 ). Mechanisms of attraction are important because of the impact that attraction processes have on individual’s life, and because increasing knowledge about these mechanisms improves our understanding of ongoing relationship dynamics ( Simpson, 1990 ; Finkel et al, 2007 ; Schindler et al, 2010 ).…”