2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00101-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-cultural differences and information systems developer values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cross-cultural evaluation of the facial expressions of avatars designed by Western designers was performed by [112]. In contrast, [113] concentrated on cross-cultural differences and information systems developer values. In addition, [114] investigated culture and its effects on human interaction design with emphasis on cross-cultural perspectives between Korea and Japan.…”
Section: Research Directions Related Work and Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-cultural evaluation of the facial expressions of avatars designed by Western designers was performed by [112]. In contrast, [113] concentrated on cross-cultural differences and information systems developer values. In addition, [114] investigated culture and its effects on human interaction design with emphasis on cross-cultural perspectives between Korea and Japan.…”
Section: Research Directions Related Work and Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relying only on labor costs may lead to wrong decisions, as productivity of human is of great importance when using information systems in such information based processes (Byrd & Turner, 2001). Thus, productivity levels which may differ from site to site (Criscoulo & Leaver, 2005) (and are in general lower in low-wage locations) due to cultural or environmental differences or communication issues (Winkler, Dibbern, & Heinzl, 2006;Kankanhalli, Tan, Wei, & Holmes, 2004) should be considered in the decision.…”
Section: Requirements For a Decision Model That Considers Automation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of research has been carried out in the past to explore the key importance of team composition and personality types in software development . However, the personality types that are useful and beneficial for ideal and effective teamwork are still not well defined for practitioners and researchers . Further, the results, extracted from different theoretical personality models, have produced contradictory fits, validity challenges, and missing guidance for software development personnel selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] However, the personality types that are useful and beneficial for ideal and effective teamwork are still not well defined for practitioners and researchers. [15][16][17][18] Further, the results, extracted from different theoretical personality models, have produced contradictory fits, validity challenges, and missing guidance for software development personnel selection. For instance, according to da Silva et al, 19 different results were obtained when models were used in practice to compose teams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%