2003
DOI: 10.1108/02683940310459600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐cultural differences in Central Europe

Abstract: The positions of four Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) on Hofstede's dimensions of national cultures are estimated on the basis of matched samples of students. Findings from The Netherlands are used to calibrate the scores found for the four Central European countries. The findings show that there are important differences between the value orientations in Western Europe (represented by The Netherlands) and Central Europe. Furthermore, there are substantial differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
103
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hofstede (1980) This study utilizes the original cultural dimensions developed by Hofstede (1980) to calculate cultural indices in different countries. Hofstede's scales has been applied in different studies across cultures to understand the behavior of people across cultures, and thus appeared to have an acceptable convergent, discriminant and external validities (Kolman et al, 2003;Swierczek, 1991;Hoppe, 1990;Holden, 1999;Lee, Anne & Geoffrey 2006;Hambrick & Brandon, 1988;Smith & Bond, 1998;Gong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hofstede (1980) This study utilizes the original cultural dimensions developed by Hofstede (1980) to calculate cultural indices in different countries. Hofstede's scales has been applied in different studies across cultures to understand the behavior of people across cultures, and thus appeared to have an acceptable convergent, discriminant and external validities (Kolman et al, 2003;Swierczek, 1991;Hoppe, 1990;Holden, 1999;Lee, Anne & Geoffrey 2006;Hambrick & Brandon, 1988;Smith & Bond, 1998;Gong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When researchers discuss culture in an international context, the name of Hofstede is invariably invoked and his dimensions are applied as an authority of holy writ (Holden, 1999) and most cultural models done after Hofstede clarify and support Hofstede's dimensions and can most relate back to Hofstede's dimensions (Smith, Dugan & Trompenaars, 1996). In addition to the fact that Hofstede's cultural dimensions have substantial face validity (Kolman et al, 2003), Hofstede's framework is still considered the most robust measure of national culture (Gong et al, 2007).…”
Section: Replication Of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions In Jordanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As J. N. Yanouzas and S. Boukis (1993) [22] mentioned, Poles are more inclined to form a group with strong trust relations and work together in «beating the enemy». According to L. Kolman, N. G. Noorderhaven, G. Hofstede and E. Dienes (2003) [16], Poland is much more collectivistic than Western European countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Svetlik and his team used the original questionnaire by Hofstede VSM 94 (Value Survey Module). We consider it a more objective research than the original one done in 2003 by Kolman (Kolman, 2003), especially, in terms of representativeness of the sample. Results of the Slovak cultural dimension are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%