2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5040-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-education improves quadriceps strength recovery after ACL reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the efects of concentric and eccentric cross-education (CE) on quadriceps strength and knee function recoveries after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Forty-eight patients (age: 29.5 ± 6.8 years, body mass index: 26.1 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 ) who had undergone ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups when they reached four weeks post surgery: (1) concentric C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In round 1, > 90% of respondents agreed on the potential clinical utility of the transfer, both for strength and motor skills. Cross-education was deemed suitable to orthopedic conditions and sports injuries, which is consistent with promising data from orthopedic cohorts [41,42], even though other studies have reported no significant value in adding crosseducation to conventional rehabilitative programs [43,44]. Unexpectedly, no consensus was reached in either round (59-67%) regarding the potential use of cross-education for treating neurological patients, despite favorable findings in stroke survivors and people with multiple sclerosis [24][25][26][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In round 1, > 90% of respondents agreed on the potential clinical utility of the transfer, both for strength and motor skills. Cross-education was deemed suitable to orthopedic conditions and sports injuries, which is consistent with promising data from orthopedic cohorts [41,42], even though other studies have reported no significant value in adding crosseducation to conventional rehabilitative programs [43,44]. Unexpectedly, no consensus was reached in either round (59-67%) regarding the potential use of cross-education for treating neurological patients, despite favorable findings in stroke survivors and people with multiple sclerosis [24][25][26][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A meta-analysis study concluded that the cross-education effect was observed irrespective of age, gender, and disease status, and the magnitude of increase in muscle strength of the non-trained muscle is 70–77 % of that of the trained muscle on average [ 15 ]. The cross-education effect may be useful for dealing with unilateral disorders due to fracture [ 23 ], ligament injury [ 17 ], and hemiplegia [ 11 ]. However, this may not be always the case, since Zult et al [ 33 , 34 ] reported that quadriceps resistance training of the non-operated leg of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction did not accelerate recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study by Onigbinde et al analyzed the effect of a unilateral strength training of the unaffected leg in knee osteoarthrosis patients (3 times/week for 6 weeks; 3 sets of 12 isometric maximal voluntary contractions) and found an increase in quadriceps muscle strength of around 20% in both legs indicating a cross education effect ( 20 ). Similarly, Harput et al have found that concentric and eccentric cross education interventions (3 times/week for 8 weeks, 3 sets of 12 isokinetic maximal voluntary contractions) improved isometric maximal voluntary contraction strength compared to standard care after ACL reconstruction ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%