2015
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross‐fostering differentially affects ADHD‐related behaviors in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Abstract: Although both genetic and non-genetic factors are known to contribute to the occurrence of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity/Disorder (ADHD), little is known about how they impact specific symptoms. We used a cross-fostering approach with an established animal model of ADHD, the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat strain (SHR), to test the influence of genotype and maternal behavior on ADHD-related behaviors. SHRs and their normo-active genetic relative, Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY), were cross-fostered to an unfamiliar d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some SHR studies have been conducted on the subject of environment and hyperactivity, but are limited to assessing environmental enrichment interventions during post-weaning periods [38, 39], not negative experiences in early life. Two previous cross-fostering studies of SHRs provide tentative hypotheses for the outcome of the present study [40, 41]. In both cases, cross-fostering SHR pups to either WKY or Sprague-Dawley control dams did not influence activity levels, consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some SHR studies have been conducted on the subject of environment and hyperactivity, but are limited to assessing environmental enrichment interventions during post-weaning periods [38, 39], not negative experiences in early life. Two previous cross-fostering studies of SHRs provide tentative hypotheses for the outcome of the present study [40, 41]. In both cases, cross-fostering SHR pups to either WKY or Sprague-Dawley control dams did not influence activity levels, consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Yet these studies preclude foresight of our outcome, due to the fact that 1) WKY maternal care is not an improvement over SHR maternal care [27], and 2) these studies employ a different definition of hyperactivity. Our selective breeding protocol defines hyperactivity as an average activity level over several days in a home cage setting, well after an extended habituated period [14, 15]; SHR hyperactivity in these studies was defined as activity across one fifteen-minute open field test [41] or activity during a ten-minute social-interaction test [40]. Therefore the present study not only corroborates previous findings in a related model of genetic hyperactivity, but also expands on them by first quantifying the vast differences in maternal behavior of both High-Active and Control dams, and then measuring the habituated hyperactivity of large samples of both male and female cross-fostered pups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult SHRs that were raised by typically active WKY mothers did not differ in locomotor hyperactivity from control SHRs raised by SHR mothers ( Howells et al, 2009 ; Gauthier et al, 2015 ). In contrast, hyper-social behavior was dependent on mother’s strain, with both SHR and WKY strains raised by SHR mothers showing increased hyper-sociability ( Gauthier et al, 2015 ). Results indicate that some ADHD-like behaviors seen in the SHR strain are genetically determined ( Howells et al, 2009 ), whereas others might be partially dependent on nurturing by SHR dams.…”
Section: Enriched Environment Studies Of Ndd Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…SHRs are a well-known model of essential hypertension [15]. An important feature of the SHR model is that it was originally derived from the normal WKY strain [16]. Therefore, in basic scientific research on the level of hypertension animals, WKYs are used as a normal control group for SHRs [2,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%