2023
DOI: 10.3390/rs15092397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Hole GPR for Soil Moisture Estimation Using Deep Learning

Abstract: This paper presents the design of a high-voltage pulse-based radar and a supervised data processing method for soil moisture estimation. The goal of this research was to design a pulse-based radar to detect changes in soil moisture using a cross-hole approach. The pulse-based radar with three transmitting antennas was placed into a 12 m deep hole, and a receiver with three receive antennas was placed into a different hole separated by 100 m from the transmitter. The pulse generator was based on a Marx generato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface seismic methods are suitable for near-surface conditions; however, they face challenges in transmitting sufficient energy through the weathered zone to desired depths due to the strong attenuation of seismic waves in unsaturated, unconsolidated sediments [1][2][3]. The cross-hole seismic imaging method has gained wide utilization in geotechnical engineering parameter calculation [4], tunnel and cavity detection [5][6][7], hydrogeology surveys [8][9][10], rock and aquifer distribution detection [11][12][13], reservoir descriptions [14][15][16], rock fragmentation descriptions [17], civil engineering [18], detection of hydrocarbon reservoirs [19][20][21] and so on. Despite this, this method also has deficiencies; for example, when cross-hole seismic receivers are arranged near the target body, the wavefield in profile between two wells is greatly influenced due to the medium inhomogeneity (especially the high-velocity target) in 3D space, leading to image distortion [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface seismic methods are suitable for near-surface conditions; however, they face challenges in transmitting sufficient energy through the weathered zone to desired depths due to the strong attenuation of seismic waves in unsaturated, unconsolidated sediments [1][2][3]. The cross-hole seismic imaging method has gained wide utilization in geotechnical engineering parameter calculation [4], tunnel and cavity detection [5][6][7], hydrogeology surveys [8][9][10], rock and aquifer distribution detection [11][12][13], reservoir descriptions [14][15][16], rock fragmentation descriptions [17], civil engineering [18], detection of hydrocarbon reservoirs [19][20][21] and so on. Despite this, this method also has deficiencies; for example, when cross-hole seismic receivers are arranged near the target body, the wavefield in profile between two wells is greatly influenced due to the medium inhomogeneity (especially the high-velocity target) in 3D space, leading to image distortion [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most ubiquitous approach towards permafrost monitoring is borehole temperature time-lapse surveys [35][36][37]. Next in abundance are geoelectric prospecting techniques, including their cross-borehole modifications and 3D data inversion: electrical resistivity tomography [38][39][40][41] and ground penetrating radar [42][43][44]. There exist experimental works that simulate resistivity monitoring of the active permafrost layer in laboratory conditions [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-well seismic can be applied to various aspects of oil and gas exploration, including detailed imaging of structures and precise characterization of reservoirs [10][11][12]. Furthermore, cross-well seismic has also been rapidly developed in the field of engineering [13,14] and has been applied in diverse areas, such as geological engineering [15][16][17], hydrogeological surveys [18][19][20], and quality inspections in civil engineering projects [21][22][23]. Currently, most cross-well seismic studies focus on two-dimensional (2D) tomographic imaging between adjacent wells [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%