2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98978-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Inference of Throughput Profiles Using Micro Kernel Network Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilize the micro-Kernel Network (mKN) method proposed in [18] to account for the inaccurate VIT link throughput measurements, as shown in the Fig. 10.…”
Section: ) Cross-inference Of Throughput Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We utilize the micro-Kernel Network (mKN) method proposed in [18] to account for the inaccurate VIT link throughput measurements, as shown in the Fig. 10.…”
Section: ) Cross-inference Of Throughput Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in measurements between VIT and physical ecosystems have a significant impact on the performance assessment, and in extremely cases could lead to inaccurate conclusions, such as I/O limit in previous section. To overcome this limitation, the mKN method [18] maps VIT measurements to ecosystem measurements by leveraging testbed measurements and strategically collected measurements on the VIT host, as described in Section IV-B3. We apply two ML methods to estimate the map f , namely, the smooth Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and nonsmooth Ensemble of Trees (EOT) methods that represent two different approaches.…”
Section: B Network Throughput Cross-inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On each connection, TCP dynamics and throughput on host systems and switches closely match those on an equivalent physical connection, since Ethernet packets are received and processed as per connection RTT and loss rate, and delivered by the hardware IXIA emulator. This setup more accurately reflects the physical TCP flows in practice than simulators such as ns-3 and riverbed (previously OPNET), and software emulators such as mininet that are subject to host system limitations [56].…”
Section: A Network Testbed Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%