2012
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.4.000847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Layer Proactive Packet Protection Switching

Abstract: Abstract-To address exponentially-increasing traffic demands, cross-layer optimized architectures will be required to access the optical layer and allow for packet-level control of larger optical flows. In this work, we investigate cross-layer communications that use performance monitoring parameters in a proactive packet protection switching scheme to reroute data traffic. The optical signal quality is captured by bit error ratio measurements and made available to higher-layers, which then trigger flow rerout… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two are the accepted approaches on how to deal with failures: protection, which is effective but not efficient since it uses a lot of extra resources, and restoration, which is efficient but not timely, since several seconds can pass between the detection of a failed lightpath (LP) and the setup of a restoration path. Past works [1] [2] addressed the issue of effectively using protection resources to deal with LP slowfailures, i.e., those that are not abrupt, but start with a progressive increase of end-to-end pre-FEC Bit Error Rate (BER). These happen for both fiber and electronics impairments [3], and the transient of their BER from the normal operative value to the FEC threshold can have a duration that spans from tens of milliseconds to even tens of seconds [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two are the accepted approaches on how to deal with failures: protection, which is effective but not efficient since it uses a lot of extra resources, and restoration, which is efficient but not timely, since several seconds can pass between the detection of a failed lightpath (LP) and the setup of a restoration path. Past works [1] [2] addressed the issue of effectively using protection resources to deal with LP slowfailures, i.e., those that are not abrupt, but start with a progressive increase of end-to-end pre-FEC Bit Error Rate (BER). These happen for both fiber and electronics impairments [3], and the transient of their BER from the normal operative value to the FEC threshold can have a duration that spans from tens of milliseconds to even tens of seconds [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%