2016
DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfw009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Ownership: A Device for Management Entrenchment?

Abstract: By artificially inflating capital and creating own shares, cross-ownership can be a key device for managerial entrenchment. This paper proposes a game-theoretical method to measure the extent of shareholder expropriation through crossownership. By properly accounting for cross-ownership linkages, we show how managers can seize indirect voting rights, and so insulate their firms from outside control. Significant examples of cross-ownership are found not only in civil law countries, but also in the U.S. mutual f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the resource is overexploited. 28 Comparing equilibrium and socially optimal equity shares. Comparing the equilibrium equity share found in Proposition 2, , and the socially optimal share identi…ed in Proposition 4, SO , we can evaluate whether the equity shares …rms choose during the …rst stage of the game are socially excessive or not.…”
Section: Welfare Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otherwise, the resource is overexploited. 28 Comparing equilibrium and socially optimal equity shares. Comparing the equilibrium equity share found in Proposition 2, , and the socially optimal share identi…ed in Proposition 4, SO , we can evaluate whether the equity shares …rms choose during the …rst stage of the game are socially excessive or not.…”
Section: Welfare Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S. mutual funds industry, State Street Corporation (STT) owns minority shares in other funds, such as 4.77% of T. Rowe Price and 3.05% in Black Rock. Similarly, T. Rowe Price Group owns 3.28% of STT, and Black Rock Inc. owns 2.68% of T. Rowe Price Group; see Levy and Szafarz (2017). Other examples include only one …rm holding equity shares on their rival's pro…ts, such as Gillette, which owns 22.9% of the non-voting stock of Wilkison Sword, Gilo et al (2006); Ford, which purchased 25% of Mazda's shares in 1979; and General Motors, which acquired 20% of Subaru's stock in 1999; see Ono et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Levy and Szafarz (2017) studied how cross-ownership linkages may also allow managers (not shareholders) to seize indirect voting rights, hence insulating their …rms from outside shareholders. They discuss how cross-ownership is nowadays a phenomenon that can be found both in civil law countries and, for example, in the US mutual fund industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We build on previous literature when we introduce our network framework, which considers the concentration, the transitivity and the consolidation of voting rights in webs of interlocking assemblies of shareholders (Levy and Szafarz, 2017;Levy, 2011;Chapelle and Szafarz, 2007;Crama and Leruth, 2007). However, our purpose is to extract corporate control structures from original shareholding activity, whereas previous works intended to study the corporate power of agents within already assigned control structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation