1996
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(96)00027-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-reactivity study of low molecular weight heparins and heparinoid in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous in vitro studies (Greinacher et al, 1992;Vun et al, 1996), we found an overall cross-reactivity rate of 10% (5/50) which was confirmed in ELISA with a significant increase in A 492 varying between 0 . 3 and 0 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In agreement with previous in vitro studies (Greinacher et al, 1992;Vun et al, 1996), we found an overall cross-reactivity rate of 10% (5/50) which was confirmed in ELISA with a significant increase in A 492 varying between 0 . 3 and 0 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Aggregrometry was performed using human citrated PRP, adjusted to a platelet count of 200 · 10 9 /l, by the method of Born using a four-channel aggregometer at 37°C (ChronoLog) with PPP as the reference, as previously described (Born, 1962;Vun et al, 1996). Control PRP from a healthy volunteer was tested in parallel with each patient sample.…”
Section: Platelet Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antigenic efficiency of a specific heparin is directly dependent on its molecular weight. The rate of complex formation with platelet factor 4 and the activation of platelet factor 4 release rise with increasing molecular size and number of sulfate groups on the glucosaminoglycans [19]. In a meta-analysis, Warkentin [17] demonstrated that the risk of antibody formation in response to heparin/platelet factor-4 complexes was significantly higher (7.8%) following administration of UHF than after application of LMW-H (2.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%