“…Given that the underlying parametric analysis does not normally consider the dependence of the material deposition rate and the shape and dimensions of the transverse cross‐section of individual material tracks with the particular physical, optical and thermal properties of the feedstock material nor with the particular characteristics of the LPD system, these process maps have to be built specifically for each case. To overcome this limitation and gain a better understanding of the process, several researchers have developed models of the LPD process (Hoadley et al , 1990; Hoadley and Rappaz, 1992; Lemoine et al , 1993; Picasso et al , 1994b; Frenk et al , 1997; Toyserkani et al , 2003; Pinkerton and Li, 2004b; Han et al , 2004; Fathi et al , 2006) that allow predicting characteristic geometric features of the laser powder deposited material tracks in terms of the processing conditions and material properties. Many of these models are formulated using energy and mass balance considerations and some models also take into account various interactions between the powder particles, the laser beam and the molten pool, such as the attenuation of the laser beam power and the heating of the feedstock powder particles as these particles are blown through the laser beam.…”